2005
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arterial Injuries from Femoral Artery Cannulation with Port Access Cardiac Surgery

Abstract: Although minimally invasive (MI) cardiac surgery reduces blood loss, hospital stay, and recovery time, some MI approaches require femoral arterial cannulation, which introduces a heretofore unknown risk of femoral arterial injury. This study was performed to examine the risk of femoral arterial injury after Port Access MI cardiac surgery (PA-MICS) with femoral cannulation. Data were prospectively obtained on 739 consecutive patients who had PA-MICS with femoral cannulation between June 1996 and April 2000, ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 They cited this risk and the risks of embolization and stroke when there is retrograde perfusion of an atheromatous thoracic aorta as the reason behind the increasing use of central cannulation in their practice. In another article on the complications of femoral cannulation, they reported a small but present risk of arterial complications with peripheral cannulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 They cited this risk and the risks of embolization and stroke when there is retrograde perfusion of an atheromatous thoracic aorta as the reason behind the increasing use of central cannulation in their practice. In another article on the complications of femoral cannulation, they reported a small but present risk of arterial complications with peripheral cannulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In some centers, a minimally invasive approach has become the standard for mitral valve surgery. 6,7 Notably, in addition to the risks, femoral perfusion may be rendered more difficult with the use of the intraluminal aortic occlusion balloon catheter because it occupies a significant part of the femoral cannula lumen (9F catheter in a 21F or 23F cannula). Femoral arterial cannulation, in particular, is not without risk, with potential complications including groin wound infection, wound seroma, intraoperative arterial injury requiring reconstruction, aortic dissection, atheroembolism, and limb ischemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, major arterial access dissections are unlikely to have been missed, because they would likely lead to limb ischemia. Femoral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass during minimally invasive cardiac surgery resulted in femoral arterial injuries (likely dissections) in seven of the 739 patients (0.9%) 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular injuries from femoral cannulation include arterial occlusion, localized arterial injuries, and aortic dissections. Major aortic dissections are rare, but can be devastating and occur in one to two percent of operations [25][26][27][28]. Peripheral vascular disease and tortuous vasculature can be assessed preoperatively by computed tomography.…”
Section: Vascular Access and Perfusion Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%