Artemisa: A Personal Driving Assistant for Fuel Saving

How to support fuel‐efficient driving?

“…Therefore, systems providing feedback after the trip (e.g. [25,53,54]) demonstrate coaching characteristics, reflection and knowledge support (Appendix, Table 3). Only one analysed study provisions the information before the trip as well [49].…”

“…Some other consider traffic condition or overall situation for eco-driving evaluation or instruction provisioning, e.g. [53,55,60]. Some systems are able to adapt decision-making based on context, e.g.…”

“…A majority of the systems were tested with real users in real vehicles, [49,53,56]. Different fuel savings were reported by these works, like 7.6% [61], 1.4% and 8.1% depending on interface [44], 7% [49,56], 11.04% [53], 4.1% [39]. Driving simulator studies are also demonstrated, as these provide safe environment for experiments, [51,62].…”

“…Moreover, visual modality is used both for the systems providing the feedback during the trip, [57] and after [54]. Audio modality is often used together with the visual one [49,53]. Muñoz-Organero and Magaña [50] focused on audio feedback and provided two versions of audio signals: sound notifications and voice output, as in their study users had different preferences.…”

Bluetooth-enabled Software Defined Radio Platform

“…This enables seamless transition to a region-specific digital radio service without direct user intervention. Within a car, Bluetooth is also used as an intra-vehicular wireless sensor network [13] and to transmit in-car information such as On-Board Diagnostics [14]. If we apply this concept of intra-vehicular network to the BeSDRP, information about built-in Bluetooth devices (screen, audio/video systems, input devices, and speakers) and Bluetooth devices of users in a car can be collected and managed for intelligent in-car infotainment systems [15].…”