2008
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database

Abstract: Motivation: Artemis and Artemis Comparison Tool (ACT) have become mainstream tools for viewing and annotating sequence data, particularly for microbial genomes. Since its first release, Artemis has been continuously developed and supported with additional functionality for editing and analysing sequences based on feedback from an active user community of laboratory biologists and professional annotators. Nevertheless, its utility has been somewhat restricted by its limitation to reading and writing from flat f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
511
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(513 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
511
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The annotated contigs, containing CDS and RNA gene predictions, were submitted to the RAST online service for functional annotation (Aziz et al, 2008). The annotations were curated using the Artemis software suite (Carver et al, 2008). The annotated sequences were deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (accession numbers CCNS01000001-CCNS01000139).…”
Section: Proteome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annotated contigs, containing CDS and RNA gene predictions, were submitted to the RAST online service for functional annotation (Aziz et al, 2008). The annotations were curated using the Artemis software suite (Carver et al, 2008). The annotated sequences were deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (accession numbers CCNS01000001-CCNS01000139).…”
Section: Proteome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained phage nucleotide sequences were analysed using Clone Manager (Sci-Ed8) and Artemis software (Carver et al, 2008). The phage sequences within the draft genome were identified using PHAge Search Tool (PHAST) (Zhou et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic sequences of other S. pyogenes strains used for comparative purposes were obtained from the NCBI Database, with RefSeq accession NC_003485 for M18-MGAS8232 and NC_009332 for M5-Manfredo. Genomic comparisons were performed using the BLAST (Zhang et al, 2000) and MUMmer (Delcher et al, 2002) and graphically viewed with Mauve (Darling et al, 2004) and ACT (Carver et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%