2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-020-00228-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artefact peaks of pore size distributions caused by unclosed sorption isotherm and tensile strength effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the N 2 measurements do not start in close vicinity to zero, adsorption at the lowest p/p 0 point of 10 -3 represents a cumulative value for pores smaller than the initial isotherm point. Similar disturbances of results are known for the desorption branch of DFT models for activated carbons [68]. Therefore, micropore filling in micropores below 1 nm cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: Pore Specific Model: Hs-nldftsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As the N 2 measurements do not start in close vicinity to zero, adsorption at the lowest p/p 0 point of 10 -3 represents a cumulative value for pores smaller than the initial isotherm point. Similar disturbances of results are known for the desorption branch of DFT models for activated carbons [68]. Therefore, micropore filling in micropores below 1 nm cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: Pore Specific Model: Hs-nldftsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…To investigate the electrochemical performance of Zn and C@Zn in ZIHS, we adopted AC, prepared in‐house, [ 51 ] which can provide extremely high specific capacity, as the cathode. [ 52–55 ] Such a high‐capacity cathode may lead to more zinc ions participating in the energy‐storage process, which is favorable for us to test the stability of anode when a large amount of zinc deposition occurs. As shown in Figure 2 a,b, the pore structure details of AC are revealed by the nitrogen adsorption−desorption measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the concept of carrying out a new original series of analyses using more advanced and reliable methods of porous structure analysis, i.e., QSDFT [42][43][44][45] and the LBET [46][47][48][49][50] methods, taking into account, among other things, surface heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present research, the following parameters and indicators were determined: the specific surface area S QSDFT [m 2 g −1 ], the volume of micropores V QSDFT [cm 3 g −1 ], and the pore size distribution PSD obtained via the QSDFT method [42][43][44][45], the value of parameters of the porous structure. i.e., the volume of the first adsorbed layer V hA [cm 3 g −1 ], the dimensionless energy parameter for the first adsorbed layer Q A /RT, the dimensionless energy parameter for the higher adsorbed layers, B C , the geometrical parameter of the porous structure determining the height of the adsorbate molecule clusters α, the geometrical parameter of the porous structure determining the width of the adsorbate molecule clusters β calculated via the LBET method [46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%