2010
DOI: 10.1308/135576110792936104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artefact in a Panoral Radiograph: A Short Communication

Abstract: Artefacts in dental radiographs are not uncommon findings. In some cases, however, such film faults might lead to difficult or even wrong diagnoses. In this brief report, the authors present a case where a small piece of paper cast a foreign body-like image onto a panoral radiograph. The importance of proper techniques and film handling when taking radiographs cannot be over-emphasised.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instances of natural and synthetic hair extensions have been found on a diversity of extraoral radiologic projections, namely panoramic and Waters view, computed tomography and cone beam‐computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging [21–23]. Entrapped hair within a panoramic film cassette has created a radiologic challenge [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instances of natural and synthetic hair extensions have been found on a diversity of extraoral radiologic projections, namely panoramic and Waters view, computed tomography and cone beam‐computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging [21–23]. Entrapped hair within a panoramic film cassette has created a radiologic challenge [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%