2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Art therapy during radiotherapy – A five-year follow-up study with women diagnosed with breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCTs also need to examine and evaluate interventions that most closely mirror CPIs currently being used in practice, for example, include several sessions. In addition, longer‐term follow‐up is needed to establish the duration of the benefits of CPIs; although there was some evidence that they were still apparent 2–3 months post‐intervention, more recent research suggests that these benefits may wane . Further, mechanisms of effects should be examined; for example, are improvements observed in anxiety and depression due to changes in self‐efficacy?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCTs also need to examine and evaluate interventions that most closely mirror CPIs currently being used in practice, for example, include several sessions. In addition, longer‐term follow‐up is needed to establish the duration of the benefits of CPIs; although there was some evidence that they were still apparent 2–3 months post‐intervention, more recent research suggests that these benefits may wane . Further, mechanisms of effects should be examined; for example, are improvements observed in anxiety and depression due to changes in self‐efficacy?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Besides that, baseline characteristics between the intervention group and control group were poorly described in most of the studies -some of them even showed evidence of imbalance in age. 16,17,19 There was no significant difference of outcome measures between the intervention and control groups at pre-intervention period in all the studies. Fours studies excluded subjects with psychiatric illness, 14,16,17,19 whereas the other two did not state this important exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Summary Of Study Designs Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…16,17,19 There was no significant difference of outcome measures between the intervention and control groups at pre-intervention period in all the studies. Fours studies excluded subjects with psychiatric illness, 14,16,17,19 whereas the other two did not state this important exclusion criteria. 15,18 None of the studies provided the reliability and validity of the measurements inside the study itself (i.e.…”
Section: Summary Of Study Designs Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations