Art for reward's sake: Visual art recruits the ventral striatum

Abstract

A recent study showed that people evaluate products more positively when they are physically associated with art images than similar non-art images. Neuroimaging studies of visual art have investigated artistic style and esthetic preference but not brain responses attributable specifically to the artistic status of images. Here we tested the hypothesis that the artistic status of images engages reward circuitry, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during viewing of art and non-art images matched for content. Subjects made animacy judgments in response to each image. Relative to non-art images, art images activated, on both subject-and item-wise analyses, reward-related regions: the ventral striatum, hypothalamus and orbitofrontal cortex. Neither response times nor ratings of familiarity or esthetic preference for art images correlated significantly with activity that was selective for art images, suggesting that these variables were not responsible for the art-selective activations. Investigation of effective connectivity, using time-varying, wavelet-based, correlation-purged Granger causality analyses, further showed that the ventral striatum was driven by visual cortical regions when viewing art images but not non-art images, and was not driven by regions that correlated with esthetic preference for either art or non -art images. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis, Corresponding author: K. Sathian, Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, WMB-6000, 101 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta GA 30322, USA, Tel: 404-727-1366, Fax: 404-727-3157, krish.sathian@emory.edu. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptNeuroimage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 March 1.

A taste of Kandinsky: assessing the influence of the artistic visual presentation of food on the dining experience

“…If this were to have been the case, the identified patterns could also have influenced the participants' liking judgments. Although participants' personal preferences (or taste) in art could have influenced our results, it should be noted that the display of art has been shown to activate reward systems in the human brain [35]. Results reported by Ramachandran [36] show that people may experience some sort of reward when processing visually complex stimuli (as, indeed, the art-inspired presentation was perceived by our participants).…”

Visual Art and Regulatory Fit Messages on Consumer Evaluations

“…Thus, the perception of art's specialness that is associated with visual artwork ) is consistent with regulatory fit, and the experience of feeling right increases the message's persuasion. Lacey et al (2011) found that individuals had a neural response that activated their reward circuit when they saw an art image; the same did not occur with non-art images. Therefore, artwork might also increase the feeling right effect by activating the brain's reward circuit.…”

Experimental Study of Aesthetic Evaluation to Multi-color Stimuli Using Semantic Differential Method

“…However, S. Lacey [13] says, in his paper "Art for reward's sake: Visual art recruits the ventral striatum": "Relative to non-art images, art images activated, on both subject-and item-wise analyses, reward-related regions: the ventral striatum, hypothalamus andorbitofrontal cortex. ... the ventral striatum was driven by visual cortical regions when viewing art images but not non-art images, and was not driven by regions that correlated with esthetic preference for either art or non-art images.…”