2006
DOI: 10.1080/00043125.2006.11651583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Art Education in the Marketplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When pressured to define the impact of arts and culture programs on students, however, organizational personnel too often overstate program effects that they cannot back up with data. In this era of accountability and evidence, hard data are necessary because organization personnel must compete for scarce resources (Rowe et al 2004;Siegesmund 2002;Strauch-Nelson 2006).…”
Section: Faulty Methods and Unwarranted Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When pressured to define the impact of arts and culture programs on students, however, organizational personnel too often overstate program effects that they cannot back up with data. In this era of accountability and evidence, hard data are necessary because organization personnel must compete for scarce resources (Rowe et al 2004;Siegesmund 2002;Strauch-Nelson 2006).…”
Section: Faulty Methods and Unwarranted Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arts are offered to some extent in all public schools (NCES 2007), but they are further compromised by inadequate resources and facilities (the "arts in a cart" trend ;NCES 2002;Strauch-Nelson 2006;Welch 2006). The arts have never been adopted in schools as equal partners with core curriculum subjects (Chapman 2005a;Hanley 2003), and their displacement has become worse since the passage of NCLB (Nichols and Berliner 2005;Mishook and Kornhaber 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation