In summer 1849, a small group gathered at Winterbourne House at Bonchurch on the Isle of Wight to watch a conjuring show by "The Unparalleled Necromancer Rhia Rhama Rhoos," a magician apparently "educated cabalistically in the Orange Groves of Salamanca and the Ocean Caves of Alum Bay" (Forster 89-90). The show promises a number of amazing set pieces, all of them 'wonders': "The Leaping Card," "The Pyramid," "The Conflagration," "The Loaf of Bread," "The Pudding," and "The Travelling Doll" (Forster 90). The audience watch the conjuror as he makes two cards selected by the audience and replaced in the pack leap forth at his command; another card is selected, named by the conjuror, set on fire and then reproduced from the ashes; another audience member's card is locked in a box and then materialises in the middle of a freshly cut loaf of bread. It is unlikely that many in the audience would have known the means by which these effects are achieved; it is certain, however, that they knew the true identity of the unparalleled necromancer Rhia Rhama Rhoos, who was none other than Charles Dickens. In this article, I consider the connections between Dickens' fiction and the art of conjuring, what Simon During calls "secular magic" (1); that is, magic that makes no claim to the supernatural, as opposed to magic in its supernatural or anthropological guises. I consider Rhia Rhama Rhoos' routine 'The Travelling Doll Wonder,' as a paradigm for reading Dickens' fiction, and Bleak House in particular, arguing that Esther's doll, an uncanny subject/object which disappears and reappears at crucial points of the text, is informed by Dickens' own performance with a disappearing doll that raises similar questions of perception and subjectivity. My wider aim is to demonstrate that what John O. Jordan calls "the Bleak House effect"-that is, "the novel's way of luring its characters (and its readers) to imagine 2 things that might have been but never were or that exist only in their minds" (147)-can be understood in the context of a similarly hyper-phenomenological cultural practice with which Dickens engaged during the composition and publication of the novel; that is, secular magic. I argue that Dickens' interest in performance magic functions metacritically in his work, especially in Bleak House, and furthermore that while the enchantment of conjuring underpins the novel, Bleak House also draws attention to the traumatic component of secular magic. Although not traumatic in itself, the experience of conjuring resembles the (in Cathy Caruth's phrase) unclaimed experiences of trauma, and it is in Bleak House that Dickens explores the connection between these discourses. Dickens' interest in performance magic is well evidenced in his novels, letters, and performances. As John Forster records, he was a keen observer of such performances in both England and France; for instance, on 3rd May 1853 Dickens invited Frank Stone to accompany him to a performance given by the influential French conjuror Jean Eugene Robert-Houdin at Sadlers Well...