Arsyad Al-Banjari’s Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law

Iqbal, Muhammad; Rahman, Shahid

doi:10.1007/s10503-020-09526-y

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…What we are developing is a possible reconstruction that, on our view, renders explicit a dialogical approach to the grounding of the juridical decisions. The notations of the semi-formal dialogues introduced in this paper is taken from Iqbal & Rahman (2021) and Rahman et al (2019), where the system is described in greater detail.…”

Section: Testing Relevancementioning

confidence: 99%

Elements for a Dialogical Approach on Parallel Reasoning. A Case Study of Spanish Civil Law

Rahman

Cazalla

Menendez

et al. 2021

New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, there is a quite considerable amount of literature on the use of analogy or more generally of inferences by parallel reasoning in contemporary legal reasoning, and particularly so within Common Law. These studies are often motivated by researches in artificial intelligence seeking to develop suitable software-support for legal reasoning. Recently; Rahman et al. ( 2019) developed a dialogical approach in the framework of Constructive Type Theory (CTT) to what in Islamic Jurisprudence was called qiyās or correlational inferences. In their last chapter the authors suggested that such an approach contributes to the study of patterns of reasoning by precedent cases within contemporary Common Law. In the present paper we will further motivate the deployment of the dialogical framework developed within Civil and Common Law. After a presentation of Scott Brewer's take on analogy within Common Law, that has striking structural similarities to reasoning by precedent case rooted in ratio legis (known in Islamic Jurisprudence as qiyās al-'illa or correlational inference by the occasioning factor), we will illustrate the implementation of the framework with a brief discussion of some cases of legal reasoning based in Spanish Civil Law, but where the accent is put in the emerging ruling rather than in the existing of a case as in Common Law. Moreover; quite surprisingly, the case under study suggests that even cases of Law-interpretation fit the argumentation pattern of qiyās al-'illa. The present paper is a follow-up

show abstract

Section: Testing Relevancementioning

confidence: 99%

Elements for a Dialogical Approach on Parallel Reasoning. A Case Study of Spanish Civil Law

Rahman

Cazalla

Menendez

et al. 2021

New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nuansa Fiqih Dalam Pemikiran Teologi Syekh Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Pada Risalah Tuhfat Al-Râghibîn

Iqbal

2021

Khazanah

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the theological thoughts of Sheikh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari in Tuhfat al-Râghibîn. Although it is a treatise on theology that actually deals with theoretical aspects (nazharî), it discusses extensively practical aspects (‘amalî). With Arsyad al-Banjari's background as an expert in Islamic law, these practical aspects are described using some notions developed in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). As a result, the nuances of fiqh are so evident in this treatise. This can be observed from the use of deontic modalities and argumentation models of fiqh to explain issues related to theology. Moreover, this treatise follows the deep structure of the so-called al-hukm al-wadh‘î in Islamic law to describe the concept of faith.Paper ini menganalisa pemikiran teologi Syekh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari dalam Tuhfat al-Râghibîn. Walaupun ini risalah tentang akidah yang sebenarnya membahas aspek-aspek teoritis (nazharî), tapi ia banyak mendiskusikan aspek-aspek praktis (‘amalî). Dengan latar belakang Arsyad al-Banjari sebagai seorang ahli fiqih, maka aspek-aspek praktis ini diuraikan dengan menuggunakan beberapa ide yang dikembangkan dalam yurisprudensi Islam (fiqih). Alhasil, nuansa fiqih sangat kentara dalam risalah ini. Ini terlihat dari penggunaan modalitas deontik dan model argumentasi fiqih untuk menguraikan persoalan-persoalan yang terkait dengan aqidah. Lebih dari itu, risalah ini mengikuti struktur dalam (deep structure) hukum wadh‘î dalam fiqih untuk menjelaskan konsep keimanan.

show abstract

Arsyad Al-Banjari’s Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law

Cited by 2 publications

References 12 publications

Elements for a Dialogical Approach on Parallel Reasoning. A Case Study of Spanish Civil Law

Elements for a Dialogical Approach on Parallel Reasoning. A Case Study of Spanish Civil Law

Nuansa Fiqih Dalam Pemikiran Teologi Syekh Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Pada Risalah Tuhfat Al-Râghibîn

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About