2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenite removal from waters by zero valent iron: Batch and column tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…PH 7 was determined to be the optimal pH, because pH values higher than 7 did not have a significant influence on arsenite removal efficiency and the removal efficiency remained almost constant. These results are close to the results of Biterna et al [15] They investigated arsenate removal using zero-valent iron powder and the results showed that the highest arsenic removal efficiency occurred at an initial concentration of 200 μg/l, with 2 g zero-valent iron at pH 7.…”
Section: The Effects Of Ph and Dose Of Waste Ironsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…PH 7 was determined to be the optimal pH, because pH values higher than 7 did not have a significant influence on arsenite removal efficiency and the removal efficiency remained almost constant. These results are close to the results of Biterna et al [15] They investigated arsenate removal using zero-valent iron powder and the results showed that the highest arsenic removal efficiency occurred at an initial concentration of 200 μg/l, with 2 g zero-valent iron at pH 7.…”
Section: The Effects Of Ph and Dose Of Waste Ironsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[13] removed arsenite from water using ZVI with a maximum sorption capacity of 1.92 mg As/g ZVI, pH not specified. [11] Also Kanel et.al. [3] reported that maximum As(III) adsorption capacity was 3.5 mg As(III)/gr by nano-ZVI after 12 h reaction time at pH=7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore many research groups use ZVI to remove arsenic from waters. [3,[10][11][12] Adsorption of As(III) was rapid on ferric hydroxide formed via Fe(0) surface oxidation by dissolved oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of previous investigations have been devoted to finding an effective technological solution for arsenic removal from natural waters. The studies have encompassed sorption processes using Fe-treated activated carbon, Fe-treated gel beads and iron oxide-coated sand [18] as well as activated carbon, [19] zero-valent iron [20] and iron hydroxide granules, [21] synthetic siderite, [22] ferric and alum salts, [23] activated alumina, [24] ion exchange, [25] a lignocellulose adsorption medium, [26] a permanganate -Fe(II) process, [27] and membrane processes. [28,29] A number of these studies have shown that arsenic is more efficiently removed from water if it is present in the As(V) form, that is, if As(III) is oxidized to As(V).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%