2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic speciation in plants growing in arsenic-contaminated sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of aboveground plant biomass, poor extractability of arsenic compounds not exceeding 50% of total arsenic content was observed similarly as in our previous experiments [34] and reported by other authors [44]. Similarly, Ruiz-Chancho et al [45] reported extraction efficiencies ranging from 3.0% to 41.4%, with good agreement between samples from the same plant species where different extraction procedures with different ratios of water and methanol were compared. Schmidt et al [46] reported the highest extraction yield of 90% for ground leaf material of Tropaeolum majus with 0.1 mol L -1 phosphate buffer, pH 7.7, in a two-step extraction with a total extraction time of 24 h. They also compared different sample pretreatment approaches where the extraction of higher amounts of arsenic (50-70% of total arsenic) from non-ground leaves with deionized water in comparison with the buffer (20-40% of total arsenic) was observed because of the osmotic effects in this case.…”
Section: Contents Of Investigated Elements and Arsenic Compounds In Rsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the case of aboveground plant biomass, poor extractability of arsenic compounds not exceeding 50% of total arsenic content was observed similarly as in our previous experiments [34] and reported by other authors [44]. Similarly, Ruiz-Chancho et al [45] reported extraction efficiencies ranging from 3.0% to 41.4%, with good agreement between samples from the same plant species where different extraction procedures with different ratios of water and methanol were compared. Schmidt et al [46] reported the highest extraction yield of 90% for ground leaf material of Tropaeolum majus with 0.1 mol L -1 phosphate buffer, pH 7.7, in a two-step extraction with a total extraction time of 24 h. They also compared different sample pretreatment approaches where the extraction of higher amounts of arsenic (50-70% of total arsenic) from non-ground leaves with deionized water in comparison with the buffer (20-40% of total arsenic) was observed because of the osmotic effects in this case.…”
Section: Contents Of Investigated Elements and Arsenic Compounds In Rsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The extracts were combined and concentrated, and then diluted to 50 mL for analysis (Ruiz-Chancho et al, 2008). After filtration through 0.45 mm filter units, arsenic speciation was analyzed by AFS-LC.…”
Section: Total Arsenic and Arsenic Speciation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the arsenic levels in rice growing in the arsenic contaminated area or inorganic arsenic from fish intake may be elevated. This might potentially increase arsenic exposure in the endemic area [77][78][79][80] . Future study of exposure assessment is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%