2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14095222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic(III) and Arsenic(V) Removal from Water Sources by Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs): A Mini Review of Recent Developments

Abstract: The present review article summarizes the recent findings reported in the literature with regard to the use of molecularly imprinted polymers for the removal of arsenic from water and wastewater. MIPs are polymers in which a template is employed in order to enable the formation of recognition sites during the covalent assembly of the bulk phase, via a polymerization or polycondensation process. The efficiency of both arsenic species and the mechanism of removal are highlighted. The results have shown that unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 The inorganic forms of arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) are the most common species in surface water, drinking water, and groundwater, with As(III) typically being regarded as more harmful than As(V). 3 The high concentration of As(III) in drinking water seriously harms human health by causing keratosis, skin damage, lung and bladder cancer, etc. Additionally, it impairs immune function in pregnant women, increasing the chance of newborn mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The inorganic forms of arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) are the most common species in surface water, drinking water, and groundwater, with As(III) typically being regarded as more harmful than As(V). 3 The high concentration of As(III) in drinking water seriously harms human health by causing keratosis, skin damage, lung and bladder cancer, etc. Additionally, it impairs immune function in pregnant women, increasing the chance of newborn mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with previous research in the literature stating arsenic(III) must generally be oxidized to arsenic(V) before removal, as adsorption is very efficient for the pentavalent arsenic species but not the trivalent arsenic species. 40 Once again, the metal-loaded activated carbon presented in this work outperforms the adsorption capacity of the standard activated carbon and the commercial benchmark, reaching 37.15 ± 2.04% total arsenic(III) adsorption (9.28 ± 0.61 mg/g) compared to the 15.09 ± 0.13% (3.59 ± 0.07 mg/g) and 12.81 ± 0.79% (2.92 ± 0.12 mg/g) observed in the standard and commercial activated carbons, respectively. Kinetics curves for arsenic(III) adsorption are given in Figure 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activated carbon, the most often used adsorbent [14], as well as various inorganic particles such as metal oxides [15], clay-based adsorbents [16], charcoal [17] and various polymers [18] have all been used for arsenic ions adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%