2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00112-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic contamination of ground and pond water and water purification system using pond water in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the total iron content was high and ranged from 1.004 to 1.761 mg L −1 . Water samples were also analyzed for total arsenic content considering the observation of Yokota et al (2001) for the surface water of Samta, Bangladesh, and it was below the detectable limit.…”
Section: Trace Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the total iron content was high and ranged from 1.004 to 1.761 mg L −1 . Water samples were also analyzed for total arsenic content considering the observation of Yokota et al (2001) for the surface water of Samta, Bangladesh, and it was below the detectable limit.…”
Section: Trace Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to precipitation/coprecipitation, which may produce large volumes of sludge that are difficult to dewater (Deliyanni et al, 2003a, 155), sorption and ion-exchange columns usually produce relatively little waste and can often be regenerated. Sorption and ion-exchange technologies also require less technical training and can be applied to small-scale operations, including small villages and even individual household wells (US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2002a, 1.1; Yokota et al, 2001;Singh, 2007). On the other hand, organic materials and silica (SiO 2 ) may foul the systems (US EPA, 2002b, 27).…”
Section: Applications and Limitations Of Sorption And Ion-exchange Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contaminated aquifer can only be isolated as much as possible from its surroundings and alternative sources of drinking water must be found. Although some surface waters may be readily treated to replace arsenic-contaminated groundwaters (Yokota et al, 2001), many of the surface waters in rural areas are too contaminated with chemicals and dangerous microorganisms for inexpensive treatment technologies (Alaerts and Khouri, 2004;Adeel, 2002, 70). Other suitable alternatives might include bottled water, pipelines, or uncontaminated aquifers.…”
Section: Treatment Technologies For Arsenic In Water 721 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 In addition, there are also concerns for bacterial contamination on numerous paper products, for example, filter paper in water and air purifying systems, and wrapping paper used in the food industry. 27,28 Filter papers are commonly covered by a thick layer of bacterial biofilm and need frequent replacement. Microbial contamination is one of the major reasons causing food spoilage during food storage, especially when the foods are packaged and stored for a long period of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%