2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic contamination of drinking water in Ireland: A spatial analysis of occurrence and potential risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, there are large concerns about water quality in private wells as they are at risk of being contaminated (de França Doria, Pidgeon, & Hunter, ; Fox, Nachman, Anderson, Lam, & Resnick, ; Inauen, Hossain, Johnston, & Mosler, ; Kreutzwiser et al., ), which is defined by Chapman () as the presence of a substance where it is undesired or at undesirable levels. While the potential for surface contamination stemming from industry and anthropogenic sources, for example, runoff from agriculture, tends to be well known among private well owners (Hynds, Misstear, & Gill, ; Hynds, Murphy, Kelly, & Fallon, ; Imgrund, Kreutzwiser, & de Loë, ; Kaercher, Po, & Nancarrow, ; O'Luanaigh, Johnston, Misstear, Patel, & Gill, ), the potential of geogenic contamination from the geological formations surrounding wells is often overlooked (Hynds et al., ; McGrory et al., ). Geogenic or natural contamination of groundwater, such as elevated levels of arsenic or uranium, can pose serious health risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, there are large concerns about water quality in private wells as they are at risk of being contaminated (de França Doria, Pidgeon, & Hunter, ; Fox, Nachman, Anderson, Lam, & Resnick, ; Inauen, Hossain, Johnston, & Mosler, ; Kreutzwiser et al., ), which is defined by Chapman () as the presence of a substance where it is undesired or at undesirable levels. While the potential for surface contamination stemming from industry and anthropogenic sources, for example, runoff from agriculture, tends to be well known among private well owners (Hynds, Misstear, & Gill, ; Hynds, Murphy, Kelly, & Fallon, ; Imgrund, Kreutzwiser, & de Loë, ; Kaercher, Po, & Nancarrow, ; O'Luanaigh, Johnston, Misstear, Patel, & Gill, ), the potential of geogenic contamination from the geological formations surrounding wells is often overlooked (Hynds et al., ; McGrory et al., ). Geogenic or natural contamination of groundwater, such as elevated levels of arsenic or uranium, can pose serious health risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drinking Water Regulations and are, therefore, not subject to any health and safety regulations or checks by authorities. Thus, well owners are not legally required to test or monitor their drinking water but are responsible for the drilling, maintenance, and monitoring of their own wells and water quality (McGrory et al., ). Although there is no formal regulation, guidelines exist, which recommend that private wells are tested regularly for bacterial (every year) and geogenic (every three years) contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined by Frederick et al (2016), generally when exploring potential relationships between elevated arsenic and various explanatory variables two primary modeling strategies can be used: logistic regression (e.g., Ayotte et al, 2003;Winkel et al, 2008;Gross and Low, 2013;Bretzler et al, 2017b), or decision tree analysis (Hossain and Piantanakulchai, 2013;Tesoriero et al, 2017). However, in this present study, an alternative approach to these modeling techniques, previously applied successfully by McGrory et al (2017) which used similar predictor variables in addition to detailed aqueous geochemistry data that can potentially explain the spatial distribution of arsenic in relation to groundwater controls (e.g., bedrock geology) was utilized. A distinct advantage of this approach is that some datasets, as is the case here, do not include well-depth information and therefore can't be analyzed using these other modeling approaches which can integrate depth as a co-variate in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Conversely in Europe there have been two (Greece and Ireland) previous national-scale arsenic groundwater assessments (Dokou et al, 2015;McGrory et al, 2017) with no regional-scale assessments having occurred. Greater numbers of national-scale assessments would assist in providing information on the patterns and distribution of arsenic in groundwater resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a study conducted in Sudan stated that resigning salinity of drinking water was observed together with human incompatibility and increase in livestock mortalities also in high concentrations and a toxic health endangerment were assessed for lead and barium [21]. A study investigated water quality in Ireland and their results showed that concentration of arsenic in groundwater is below 7.5 μg [22]. They indicated that several areas with elevated arsenic concentrations in groundwater were treated using technologies.…”
Section: Water Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%