Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1983
DOI: 10.1021/es00118a008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic, antimony, germanium, and tin in the Tejo estuary, Portugal: modeling a polluted estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In rivers, the dissolved tin content ranges from 0.3 to 17ppb. 6 Tin in water supply reservoirs of most European and American cities is similarly low, ranging from 0 to 0.1 p~m .~?~ Thus it may be concluded that tin concentrations in the geosphere (with the exception of ore deposits and anthropogenically polluted areas) are uniform and low. Nevertheless, these are the main sources for intake into humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rivers, the dissolved tin content ranges from 0.3 to 17ppb. 6 Tin in water supply reservoirs of most European and American cities is similarly low, ranging from 0 to 0.1 p~m .~?~ Thus it may be concluded that tin concentrations in the geosphere (with the exception of ore deposits and anthropogenically polluted areas) are uniform and low. Nevertheless, these are the main sources for intake into humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background arsenic concentrations within the river varied between 9.5 and 23 nM during 1982, averaging 15 nM. The arsenic levels chosen are within the range of natural and moderately polluted river/estuarine systems (Andreae 1978, Andreae et al 1983, Langston 1983 Daily water samples were taken from each tank for phytoplankton enumeration. Of these, initially 3 wk-I were examined; the remainder were archived for later examination if required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estuaries can be divided into those in which the principal arsenic input is of marine origin (Waslenchuk and Windom, 1978;Howard et al, 1984;Froelich et al, 1985) and those in which the river is the major arsenic source (Andreae et al, 1983;Knox et al, 1984;Millward and Marsh, 1986). In this respect the Anllóns estuary shows an ambivalent behaviour.…”
Section: The Estuarine Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenic in the sediment can also play a role in the arsenic exchange. Non-conservative behaviour in estuaries due to processes such as diffusion from sediment pore waters or co-precipitation with iron oxides has been observed (Andreae et al, 1983;Andreae and Andreae, 1989). Estuaries polluted with anthropogenic sources of arsenic generally display high As-levels with input maxima somewhere within the estuary (Froelich et al, 1985); such a behaviour occurs in the mid-estuary of Tamar which has 3.7-5.3g L -1 of arsenic attributed to a release from arsenic-rich estuarine sediments (Knox et al, 1984).…”
Section: The Estuarine Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%