“…In general, As(III) is adsorbed at neutral pH ( Figure 3) and As(V) at a wide range of pH (2-10) depending on the adsorbent material used. A similar trend on arsenic adsorption by various adsorbents was reported by [50,57,60,103].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Arsenic Removalsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…At a certain selected pH, the adsorption showed an increasing trend due to the positively charged alumina complexes AlF 2+ and AlF 2 + on fluoride removal by acidic alumina [32]. The fluoride adsorption decreased after pHzpc because the concentration of protonated surface sites decreases with increasing pH [4,73], which causes strong competition of hydroxide ions [57]. A similar observation was reported by [66] on defluoridation of drinking water using chitosan-based mesoporous alumina.…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Fluoride Removalsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These materials include anions and cations and organic matters [51][52][53][54][55]. Anions such as sulfate, nitrate, carbonate, chloride, bicarbonate, and phosphate influence adsorption by adjustment of the electrostatic charge at the solid surface because of the same negative ions [11,[56][57][58][59][60][61]. The effects of anions on fluoride removal were reported by [40,[62][63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Adsorption Methods For Arsenic and Fluoride Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar observation was reported by [89] on aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite as an adsorbent. Arsenic adsorption was reduced by more than 20% when phosphate concentration increased by more than 0.2 mM on copper (II) oxide nanoparticles as adsorbents [57]. Maiti et al [50] reported that arsenic was reduced to 72.9% removal when phosphate concentration was increased to 5 mg/L on synthetic siderite as an adsorbent for As(V) removal.…”
This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an indepth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) removal by adsorption and the anions' characteristics during the adsorption process. The surface area of the adsorbents does not contribute to the adsorption capacity of these anions but rather a combination of other physical and chemical properties. The adsorption capacity for the anions depends on the combination of all the factors: pH, ionic strength, coexisting substances, pore volume and particles size, surface modification, pretreatment of the adsorbents, and so forth. Extreme higher adsorption capacity can be obtained by the modification of the adsorbents. In general, pH has a greater influence on adsorption capacity at large, since it affects the ionic strength, coexisting anions such as bicarbonate, sulfate, and silica, the surface charges of the adsorbents, and the ionic species which can be present in the solution.
“…In general, As(III) is adsorbed at neutral pH ( Figure 3) and As(V) at a wide range of pH (2-10) depending on the adsorbent material used. A similar trend on arsenic adsorption by various adsorbents was reported by [50,57,60,103].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Arsenic Removalsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…At a certain selected pH, the adsorption showed an increasing trend due to the positively charged alumina complexes AlF 2+ and AlF 2 + on fluoride removal by acidic alumina [32]. The fluoride adsorption decreased after pHzpc because the concentration of protonated surface sites decreases with increasing pH [4,73], which causes strong competition of hydroxide ions [57]. A similar observation was reported by [66] on defluoridation of drinking water using chitosan-based mesoporous alumina.…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Fluoride Removalsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These materials include anions and cations and organic matters [51][52][53][54][55]. Anions such as sulfate, nitrate, carbonate, chloride, bicarbonate, and phosphate influence adsorption by adjustment of the electrostatic charge at the solid surface because of the same negative ions [11,[56][57][58][59][60][61]. The effects of anions on fluoride removal were reported by [40,[62][63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Adsorption Methods For Arsenic and Fluoride Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar observation was reported by [89] on aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite as an adsorbent. Arsenic adsorption was reduced by more than 20% when phosphate concentration increased by more than 0.2 mM on copper (II) oxide nanoparticles as adsorbents [57]. Maiti et al [50] reported that arsenic was reduced to 72.9% removal when phosphate concentration was increased to 5 mg/L on synthetic siderite as an adsorbent for As(V) removal.…”
This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an indepth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) removal by adsorption and the anions' characteristics during the adsorption process. The surface area of the adsorbents does not contribute to the adsorption capacity of these anions but rather a combination of other physical and chemical properties. The adsorption capacity for the anions depends on the combination of all the factors: pH, ionic strength, coexisting substances, pore volume and particles size, surface modification, pretreatment of the adsorbents, and so forth. Extreme higher adsorption capacity can be obtained by the modification of the adsorbents. In general, pH has a greater influence on adsorption capacity at large, since it affects the ionic strength, coexisting anions such as bicarbonate, sulfate, and silica, the surface charges of the adsorbents, and the ionic species which can be present in the solution.
“…The plot of C e /q e versus C e at 20 o C is shown in Figure 9a. The essential characteristics of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed in terms of a dimensionless equilibrium parameter (R L ), which is defi ned by the following equation: (6) where b (L mg -1 ) is the Langmuir constant and C 0 (mg L -1 ) is the highest initial concentration of the adsorbate. The value of R L indicates the type of the isotherm to be either unfavorable (R L > 1), linear (R L = 1), favorable (0 < R L < 1) or irreversible (R L = 0).…”
The removal of Ni 2+ from aqueous solution by iron nanoparticles encapsulated by graphitic layers (Fe@G) was investigated. Nanoparticles Fe@G were prepared by chemical vapor deposition CVD process using methane as a carbon source and nanocrystalline iron. The properties of Fe@G were characterized by X-ray Diffraction method (XRD), High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM), Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), BET surface area and zeta potential measurements. The effects of initial Ni 2+ concentration (1-20 mg L -1 ), pH (4-11) and temperature (20-60 o C) on adsorption capacity were studied. The adsorption capacity at equilibrium increased from 2.96 to 8.78 mg g -1 , with the increase in the initial concentration of Ni 2+ from 1 to 20 mg L -1 at pH 7.0 and 20 o C. The experimental results indicated that the maximum Ni 2+ removal could be attained at a solution pH of 8.2 and the adsorption capacity obtained was 9.33 mg g -1 . The experimental data fi tted well with the Langmuir model with a monolayer adsorption capacity of 9.20 mg g -1 . The adsorption kinetics was found to follow pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Thermodynamics parameters, ΔHO, ΔGO and ΔSO, were calculated, indicating that the adsorption of Ni 2+ onto Fe@G was spontaneous and endothermic in nature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.