2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenate uptake and arsenite simultaneous sorption and oxidation by Fe–Mn binary oxides: Influence of Mn/Fe ratio, pH, Ca2+, and humic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fast precipitation of released Fe(III) speciation might occur (Eqs. (18)- (20)) and led to the improvement of As(III) removal at low pH conditions, which could account for the difference in the removal of As(III) by FBBS below pH 6.0 from that by amorphous Fe oxide [40]. The concentrations of released Fe were reduced to as low as 0.18 mg/L with pH increased to 7.…”
Section: Effects Of Solution Ph On As(iii) Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The fast precipitation of released Fe(III) speciation might occur (Eqs. (18)- (20)) and led to the improvement of As(III) removal at low pH conditions, which could account for the difference in the removal of As(III) by FBBS below pH 6.0 from that by amorphous Fe oxide [40]. The concentrations of released Fe were reduced to as low as 0.18 mg/L with pH increased to 7.…”
Section: Effects Of Solution Ph On As(iii) Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2d). The PZC of pure ferrihydrite is about pH 7.4 (Zhang et al, 2012) and that of CuO is pH 9.4 (Yoon et al, 1979). Obviously, the incorporation of CuO with iron oxide makes the composite a higher PZC than that of pure ferrihydrite.…”
Section: Characterization Of 1:2 Feecu Binary Oxidementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For arsenite, the uncharged H 3 AsO 3 dominates at pH lower than 9.0 under reducing conditions (Yan et al, 2000;Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). Various treatment techniques such as coagulation/precipitation (Scott et al, 1995), ion-exchange (Kartinen and Martin, 1995), sorption (Jang et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2007a) and membrane processes (Kartinen and Martin, 1995;Waypa et al, 1997) have been developed and employed for arsenic removal. Due to its simplicity, high efficiency and cost-effectiveness, sorption processes are regarded as the most promising methods and largely used for arsenic removal from water and wastewater (Jang et al, 2006;.Sharma and Sohn, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At lower pHs, it is thought that surface hydroxyl sites undergo increased protonation to form OH2 + and stronger As sorption results from the increased number of these positively charged sites which are inherently more attractive to the negatively charged arsenate ions (H2AsO4 -and HAsO4 2-) in solution [39].…”
Section: Batch Sorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%