2008 International Conference on Radar 2008
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2008.4653917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array optimization and adaptive processing for sub-array based thinned arrays

Abstract: In this work a new approach is proposed for the optimized design of a thinned array, based on a small set of different sub-array types (with assigned properties), properly disposed on a planar surface. The small number of different sub-array shapes is relevant for industrial production, to reduce design and manufacturing costs, as well as to allow scalable antenna designs for different applications. The optimization of the design is based on the maximization of an objective function, involving the side lobe le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows one to use the same large array in a different scenario; each time, a different set of microphones gives optimal beamforming quality. This technique is called array thinning and has been successfully implemented in antenna arrays [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. However, there are only a few papers devoted to thinning microphone arrays [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows one to use the same large array in a different scenario; each time, a different set of microphones gives optimal beamforming quality. This technique is called array thinning and has been successfully implemented in antenna arrays [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. However, there are only a few papers devoted to thinning microphone arrays [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radar systems based on antenna arrays can typically employ different strategies to protect themselves from unwanted intentional or environmental electromagnetic interferences, especially when impinging on the side-lobes of the synthesized array pattern. A basic way to try and mitigate the effects of undesired components of the received signal is to lower the level of the side-lobes of the array pattern [4]: different strategies can be employed, from traditional amplitude tapering [5] to efficient antenna aperture thinning at element or subarray level, as for example, the one developed and implemented in [6,7]. A different way to reject the interference component from the received signal is to null the synthesized pattern in the estimated jammer Direction of Arrival (DoA) performing the adaptive processing called antenna nulling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Farina with different coauthors has given creative and pioneering contributions to the following aspects, including subarrayed weighting for SLC [25,26], subarrayed adaptation and superresolution [25][26][27], and subarray optimization [25,28]. Lombardo and his co-authors contributed great achievements to subarrayed adaptive processing and pattern control [29,30], SASP for thinned arrays [31,32], while Massa et al contributed in the fields of subarrayed weighting, synthesis of sum and difference patterns for monopulse [33][34][35][36]; Liao et al in the field of subarrayed 2 International Journal of Antennas and Propagation ABF, subarrayed STAP and subarray architectures [23,37,38]; Wang et al in the field of subarrayed STAP and subarray configuration [39][40][41][42]; Klemm in the field of the design of the subarray configuration for STAP [43], and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%