1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf02138511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arousal threshold in the cat as a function of sleep phase and stimulus significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For one thing, our data show an altered distribution of firing rates which could throw off any simple read-out by higher cortical areas such as association areas or frontal cortex (if read-out mechanisms are even online during sleep). Assuming A1 and LB play a role in perception during sleep, our data suggest that information carried by mean activity levels or temporal response patterns may reflect the neural basis for subconscious detection or discrimination of sounds during sleep in humans (Bonnet, 1982; Oswald et al, 1960; Beh and Barrat, 1965; Langford et al, 1974; McDonald et al, 1975; Voss and Harsh, 1998) and animals (Halperin and Iorio, 1981; Siegel and Langley, 1965; Van Twyver and Garrett, 1972; Maho and Hennevin, 1999). The findings reported here stand in contrast to original theories that assumed that the brain shuts off to the external world during sleep (Steriade et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For one thing, our data show an altered distribution of firing rates which could throw off any simple read-out by higher cortical areas such as association areas or frontal cortex (if read-out mechanisms are even online during sleep). Assuming A1 and LB play a role in perception during sleep, our data suggest that information carried by mean activity levels or temporal response patterns may reflect the neural basis for subconscious detection or discrimination of sounds during sleep in humans (Bonnet, 1982; Oswald et al, 1960; Beh and Barrat, 1965; Langford et al, 1974; McDonald et al, 1975; Voss and Harsh, 1998) and animals (Halperin and Iorio, 1981; Siegel and Langley, 1965; Van Twyver and Garrett, 1972; Maho and Hennevin, 1999). The findings reported here stand in contrast to original theories that assumed that the brain shuts off to the external world during sleep (Steriade et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Some studies in other sleep models have reported differences in arousability from different sleep stages, and while REM sleep was originally hypothesized to be associated with increased vigilance, this has not been confirmed experimentally (Siegel and Langley, 1965; Snyder, 1966). In the current dog studies, the PSG analyses indicated that vehicle- and DORA-treated dogs were similarly able to awaken from all sleep stages in response to the conditioned acoustic stimulus, without a predictive effect of sleep stage on arousability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that the emotional significance of a stimulus is associated with the ability to induce an arousal response from natural sleep, as demonstrated by early sleep experiments in rodents (Van Twyver and Garrett, 1972), cats (Buendia et al, 1963; Siegel and Langley, 1965), and humans (Oswald et al, 1960; Langford et al, 1974). Consistent with the historical literature, the DORA- and vehicle-treated dogs in this study awoke completely in response to the emotionally salient conditioned tone presentation but were not aroused by similar tones played randomly without conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations