2017
DOI: 10.1002/malq.201600040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aronszajn trees, square principles, and stationary reflection

Abstract: We investigate questions involving Aronszajn trees, square principles, and stationary reflection. We first consider two strengthenings of □(κ) introduced by Brodsky and Rinot for the purpose of constructing κ‐Souslin trees. Answering a question of Rinot, we prove that the weaker of these strengthenings is compatible with stationary reflection at κ but the stronger is not. We then prove that, if μ is a singular cardinal, □μ implies the existence of a special μ+‐tree with a cf(μ)‐ascent path, thus answering a qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the choice of µ = 2 is justified by a recent result of Shani [Sha16] and independently Lambie-Hanson [LH17] which implies that none of the results obtained in this paper follow from µ = 3. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Note that the choice of µ = 2 is justified by a recent result of Shani [Sha16] and independently Lambie-Hanson [LH17] which implies that none of the results obtained in this paper follow from µ = 3. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In particular, we mention a recent result of Krueger [13] on the club-isomorphism of higher Aronszajn trees that could substitute the Abraham-Shelah model. The construction schemes developed by Brodsky, Lambie-Hanson and Rinot [4,15,18] for higher Suslin and Aronszajn trees also seem rather relevant. The theorem of Jensen on CH and all Aronszajn trees being special was recently generalized to higher cardinals in a breakthrough result by Asperó and Golshani [2].…”
Section: Proof (1) Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if µ is singular, then µ implies ind µ,cf(µ) (cf. [7]), while, if λ < µ are regular infinite cardinals, then (µ) implies ind (µ, λ) (cf. [9]).…”
Section: Definition 34 ([8]mentioning
confidence: 99%