Dedicated to Professor Emanuel VogelA recent computational study of Schleyer and co-workers [1] is reviewed, which led these authors to the firm conclusion that [18]annulene has a localized structure with alternating single and double C,C bonds, contrary to earlier crystallographic analyses of X-ray-diffraction data favoring a delocalized non-alternating form. It is pointed out i) that deceptive orientational disorder phenomena in the crystal might be subject to experimental resolution in this case, and ii) that, in contrast to gas and solution phases, [18]annulene might possibly assume the non-alternating structure in the crystalline solid state.From a comparison of calculated and observed 1 H-NMR chemical shifts, it has recently been firmly concluded by Schleyer and co-workers that [18]annulene prefers a structure with alternating (−localized×) C,C single and double bonds, rather than a nonalternating (−delocalized×) structure of maximum symmetry D 6h with more nearly equalized, but ± for obvious symmetry reasons ± not exactly equal, C,C lengths [1] 1 ). The latter had previously been deduced from single-crystal X-ray-diffraction data [2] [3]. In addition, the best computed structure of [18]annulene, an alternating, slightly non-planar potential-energy minimum of C 2 symmetry, was calculated ca. 3 kcal mol À1 energetically lower than the non-alternating D 6h form, reported as a transition state with the high imaginary frequency of ca. 1100i cm À1 [1]. Schleyer and co-workers conclude from their results that the X-ray geometry of [18]annulene is not correct, and attribute this putative crystallographic failure to supposedly insurmountable disorder problems similar to those indicated previously for the related fundamental case of benzene [4]. In the following, we wish to point out that,