2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(01)01320-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aromaticity strongly affected by substituents in fulvene and heptafulvene as a new method of estimating the resonance effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NICS values cannot be used to perform this kind of comparison, since they strongly depend on the area of the ring [53]. When HOMA is applied, it gives −0.286 for fulvene and 0.164 for heptafulvene [6]. In order to investigate this issue at the level of the actual approaches applied to estimate the aromatic stabilization energy, we followed the procedure presented below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…NICS values cannot be used to perform this kind of comparison, since they strongly depend on the area of the ring [53]. When HOMA is applied, it gives −0.286 for fulvene and 0.164 for heptafulvene [6]. In order to investigate this issue at the level of the actual approaches applied to estimate the aromatic stabilization energy, we followed the procedure presented below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hess-Schaad model for estimating the resonance energy per π electron (REPE) [4] gives the same value for fulvene and heptafulvene (REPE = −0.002), indicating that they both possess nonaromatic character. Schleyer's NICS [5] value for heptafulvene is 8.468 [6], clearly indicating its non-or even antiaromatic character. Since heptafulvene has 4N+3 π electrons, it becomes more stable when electron-withdrawing substituents are added to it, allowing the number of π electrons in the ring to approach 4N+2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the fluoro substituent is known to behave in an unexpected way. [59,60] It is strongly electron accepting and relatively strongly p-electron donating. When F or MeO groups are in the meta position(s), CSF1 changes its sign.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the calculated quantities (e.g., bond lengths) are mixed with the experimental ones, the shortcomings of quantum chemical treatment are bound to resurface. Unfortunately, HOMA is routinely calculated in just such a way: the theoretically obtained bond lengths for a studied system are combined with the parameterization based on experimental geometries of the reference molecules [7,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. One may have justified suspicions that HOMA computed in such a way would undergo strong changes with a change of the basis set, computational method, or even the exchange-correlation functional of DFT (a great variety of which have been recently developed and presented for general use).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%