The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2016
DOI: 10.5840/envirophil201613245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arne Johan Vetlesen. The Denial of Nature: Environmental Philosophy in the Era of Global Capitalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the dualism remained and gained momentum in modernity with the expansion of the Baconian idea of dominion over nature and the Cartesian externalization of it as a separate object (Haila, 2000: 159, 164, 170). Today, we are tragically confirming that destroying nature requires abstraction and the absence of direct experience on the part of those destroying it (Vetlesen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dualism remained and gained momentum in modernity with the expansion of the Baconian idea of dominion over nature and the Cartesian externalization of it as a separate object (Haila, 2000: 159, 164, 170). Today, we are tragically confirming that destroying nature requires abstraction and the absence of direct experience on the part of those destroying it (Vetlesen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive use of natural resources is justified by higher material wealth, which however does not always lead to long-term well-being (Jackson, 2009;Kallis, 2018). On the contrary, the so-called "progress" can create new hazards when it comes to psychological health (Sørensen, 2010; see also Vetlesen, 2016). It is not within the scope of this article to provide universal explanations of the many causes of the mental health epidemic in the Global North.…”
Section: Modern Suffering As Antecedent For Ecological Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To come to grips with the ways in which that dialectic now backfires and becomes dangerous to humans as well as to nature, an ethics that comprises other than humans as intrinsically valuable is urgently needed. In keeping with the science of ecology, such a biocentric, non‐ (but not anti‐) anthropocentric ethics acknowledges value as an ever‐regenerative force operative in nature rather than as something projected onto it by humans, thus rejecting the hubris of holding that value is of our making, something determined by us and that comprises only us (see Rolston, 1988; Vetlesen, 2015). The point of departure for such an ethics is the ecological insight into humans’ dependence on the multitude of other‐than‐human “Others,” a dependence ineluctably given as the condition without which a good life and a just society would be impossible.…”
Section: A Backfiring Dialecticmentioning
confidence: 99%