1945
DOI: 10.1177/001316444500500303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Army General Classification Test Scores for Civilian Occupations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evolutionarily novel; thus, I would predict people with greater general intelligence to do it more effectively than those with less general intelligence. As Table 1 and numerous other studies show (Fryer, 1922;Harrell & Harrell, 1945;Jencks, 1972, pp. 220 -221;Jensen, 1980, pp.…”
Section: The Central Theoretical Problem Of Human Sociobiologymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is evolutionarily novel; thus, I would predict people with greater general intelligence to do it more effectively than those with less general intelligence. As Table 1 and numerous other studies show (Fryer, 1922;Harrell & Harrell, 1945;Jencks, 1972, pp. 220 -221;Jensen, 1980, pp.…”
Section: The Central Theoretical Problem Of Human Sociobiologymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…I have computed the correlation between the occupation-specific mean and standard deviation, which is –.32—modest, but consistent with Jensen’s expectations. Rather, Jensen here relies mainly on a well-known set of data from World War II, giving scores of 18,782 White enlisted men in the Army Air Force on the Army General Classification Test (AGCT) along with previous civilian occupation (Harrell & Harrell, 1945). He describes the inverse relationship between the occupational test score and its standard deviation only with a series of anecdotes, but the correlation is remarkably high.…”
Section: Occupational Differentials In Ability: a Psychometric Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, civilians who scored exceptionally well were often placed in the officer ranks; that is, high scorers did not tend to show up among enlisted men. According to Harrell and Harrell (1945), “It is possible that averages among the professional occupations are too low since conceivably many of the best men in the profession would have been officer material” (pp. 229–230).…”
Section: Occupational Differentials In Ability: a Psychometric Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 Evidence for the assumptions and the theorem A1. More intelligent men are more likely to attain higher status than less intelligent men (Austin & Hanisch, 1990;Ball, 1938;Fryer, 1922;Ghiselli, 1973;Harrell & Harrell, 1945;Hunter, 1986;Hunter & Hunter, 1984;Jencks, 1972;Jensen, 1980;Mascie-Taylor & Gibson, 1978;Reynolds et al, 1987;Terman & Oden, 1959;Thorndike & Hagen, 1959;U.S. Department of Labor, 1970;Waller, 1971) A2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant positive correlation between the mean IQ and the occupational prestige among both the draftees of World War I (Fryer, 1922) and those of World War II (Harrell & Harrell, 1945). The 1970 data from the U.S. Department of Labor show the following mean IQs for selected occupations: engineer (130), accountant (118), teacher (114), bookkeeper (110), photographer (108), stenographer (106), machinist (104), carpenter (99), laborer (92), and stock clerk (84).…”
Section: A Note On Parsimonymentioning
confidence: 93%