Evolution of Primary Producers in the Sea 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012370518-1/50015-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Armor: Why, When, and How

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, dinoflagellates (except for calcifying species; (Van de Waal et al, 2013)) with generally inefficient CO 2 -fixing RuBisCO enzymes (Tortell, 2000) may even profit from chemical changes since photosynthetic carbon fixation as their source of structural elements in the form of cellulose should be facilitated by the ocean acidification-associated CO 2 fertilization Reinfelder, 2011). Under the assumption that any form of shell/exoskeleton protects phytoplankton against predation (as argued by Hamm and Smetacek, 2007), non-calcareous armors may be the preferable solution to realize protection in a future ocean (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Embedding the Physiological Concept In Ecological Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, dinoflagellates (except for calcifying species; (Van de Waal et al, 2013)) with generally inefficient CO 2 -fixing RuBisCO enzymes (Tortell, 2000) may even profit from chemical changes since photosynthetic carbon fixation as their source of structural elements in the form of cellulose should be facilitated by the ocean acidification-associated CO 2 fertilization Reinfelder, 2011). Under the assumption that any form of shell/exoskeleton protects phytoplankton against predation (as argued by Hamm and Smetacek, 2007), non-calcareous armors may be the preferable solution to realize protection in a future ocean (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Embedding the Physiological Concept In Ecological Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the key biological functions of the cell wall lie important mechanical functions, such as preventing virus penetration, protecting diatoms from the mandibles of predators, or even digestion in some cases. [7][8][9] Applications of materials and technologies inspired from diatoms are widespread and encompass multiple disciplines. Some examples of applications are filters, molecular sieves, resins, insulators, sensors, electronics, optical coatings, environmental indicators of fresh and salt water, and the reduction of red tide's toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() demonstrated, for instance, that crushing diatom silica shells requires a substantial energy investment on the part of grazers (e.g., through the formation of specialized tools) and suggested that diatom frustules have evolved as mechanical defenses from grazers (Hamm et al. , Hamm and Smetacek ), provided that the predators could reject, after a first “bite,” cells with an especially tough frustule. This argument may be extended to a coevolution of grazers and prey: some grazers, after experiencing (over a time compatible with evolutionary responses) the difficulty of eating diatoms with a strong frustule, may have developed ways of sensing silica; this would prevent the energetic costs associated with capture and subsequent rejection of hard‐to‐break cells.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%