2021
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arming Immune Cells for Battle: A Brief Journey through the Advancements of T and NK Cell Immunotherapy

Abstract: The promising development of adoptive immunotherapy over the last four decades has revealed numerous therapeutic approaches in which dedicated immune cells are modified and administered to eliminate malignant cells. Starting in the early 1980s, lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells were the first ex vivo generated NK cell-enriched products utilized for adoptive immunotherapy. Over the past decades, various immunotherapies have been developed, including cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, as a peripheral blo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
(327 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will focus on pros and cons related to three major items: (a) the source of NK cells (from progenitors or from already-differentiated cells); (b) the use of autologous vs. allogeneic NK cells; and (c) the use of naïve vs. activated, engineered or monoclonal-antibody-associated NK cells. As recently reviewed by Wendel et al [2], Riendl et al [149] and Gauthier et al [150], clinical immunotherapy trials involving NK cells are ongoing in both hematological malignancies (acute and chronic leukemia, aggressive and indolent lymphomas as well as myelomas) and (to a lower extent) in solid cancers, in the pancreas, the prostate, the ovary, the breast, the brain, the lung, the liver and the digestive tube.…”
Section: Nk Cells As Cancer Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We will focus on pros and cons related to three major items: (a) the source of NK cells (from progenitors or from already-differentiated cells); (b) the use of autologous vs. allogeneic NK cells; and (c) the use of naïve vs. activated, engineered or monoclonal-antibody-associated NK cells. As recently reviewed by Wendel et al [2], Riendl et al [149] and Gauthier et al [150], clinical immunotherapy trials involving NK cells are ongoing in both hematological malignancies (acute and chronic leukemia, aggressive and indolent lymphomas as well as myelomas) and (to a lower extent) in solid cancers, in the pancreas, the prostate, the ovary, the breast, the brain, the lung, the liver and the digestive tube.…”
Section: Nk Cells As Cancer Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time, a very large majority of clinical trials involving NK cells designed for cancer patients are using mature cells collected from the PB of healthy donors; these cells become naïve or activated after being exposed to cytokines ex vivo or after infusion. Only a minority of trials are using UCB-or PB-derived CD34 + progenitors expanded ex vivo before being reinfused, cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells or engineered CAR-NK cells [2,149], which will be discussed below.…”
Section: Clinical-grade Nk Cells Generated From Differentiated or Progenitor Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations