1990
DOI: 10.1021/jo00312a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Armed/disarmed effects in glycosyl donors: rationalization and sidetracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
153
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
153
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both species were found to be more energetically favoured than the non-coordinated oxocarbenium ion. Optimizing experiments were first conducted with common activating conditions, such as NIS/AgOTf, NIS/TMSOTf and Ph 2 SO/Tf 2 O/TTBP ( In general, the structure of glycosyl acceptors only shows complementary effects 28 on stereoselectivity of a glycosylation reaction, compared with the structure of donors [29][30][31] , and other factors such as temperature or solvents. Glycosyl acceptors bearing electron-withdrawing substituents should diminish the nucleophilicity of the hydroxyl group, resulting in a decrease of reaction rate 29,32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both species were found to be more energetically favoured than the non-coordinated oxocarbenium ion. Optimizing experiments were first conducted with common activating conditions, such as NIS/AgOTf, NIS/TMSOTf and Ph 2 SO/Tf 2 O/TTBP ( In general, the structure of glycosyl acceptors only shows complementary effects 28 on stereoselectivity of a glycosylation reaction, compared with the structure of donors [29][30][31] , and other factors such as temperature or solvents. Glycosyl acceptors bearing electron-withdrawing substituents should diminish the nucleophilicity of the hydroxyl group, resulting in a decrease of reaction rate 29,32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction of 5a with 1.5 molar equivalent of 1a as a sialosyl donor using 3.0 molar equivalent of N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) and 0.5 eq of triethylsilyl triflate (TESOTf) 15) in CH 3 CN at room temperature gave the expected glycosides 6a in 68% yield with a-anomer as the major product (a/bϭ2 : 1) (entry 1, Table 1). The a/b ratio was determined by integration of the H-3eq 1 H-NMR signal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant development in stereoselective glycosylation chemistry was made a quarter century ago when the idea of matched/mismatched donors and acceptors based on the armed or disarmed reactivity of glycosyl donors was proposed by Fraser-Reid. 50 Fraser-Reid demonstrated for the first time that competitive glycosylation between armed and disarmed donors could be chemoselective with an armed donor reacting preferentially to give a mixture of glycosides (a/b 2:1) while a disarmed donor would remain unreactive. Subsequently other groups have expanded on this concept to show that armed/disarmed reactivity could be modulated to achieve stereoselectivity in the glycosylation reaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%