2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
182
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
10
182
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, BB is a proximal upper limb muscle with typically high TMS-induced resting motor thresholds (RThs) and thus requires the application of high stimulation intensities (Gerachshenko and Stinear, 2007;Rothwell et al, 1991;Turton et al, 1996;. Second, paretic muscle motor thresholds are increased following stroke (Talelli et al, 2006). Our preliminary experiments confirmed that the combination of those two factors results in a low probability of obtaining MEPs in a relaxed paretic BB.…”
Section: Technical Considerationssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…First, BB is a proximal upper limb muscle with typically high TMS-induced resting motor thresholds (RThs) and thus requires the application of high stimulation intensities (Gerachshenko and Stinear, 2007;Rothwell et al, 1991;Turton et al, 1996;. Second, paretic muscle motor thresholds are increased following stroke (Talelli et al, 2006). Our preliminary experiments confirmed that the combination of those two factors results in a low probability of obtaining MEPs in a relaxed paretic BB.…”
Section: Technical Considerationssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In contrast, subcortical strokes are less likely to induce changes in excitability of cortical neurons, but instead cause interruption to corticospinal fibres, seen as increase in the rMT and decrease in the MEP amplitude. Again, possible resolution in the early recovery stage may explain the rapid changes in CSE in the acute stage [29]. Although, the apparent CSE recovery seen in figure 1 appears strong, some previous studies have concluded that the rMT is influenced by multiple structural and functional characteristics of both cortical and spinal neurons negatively affecting its ability to act as a reliable biomarker regarding inter-hemispheric differences in excitability [7,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7 Previous studies evaluating motor cortex excitability in the acute and subacute stages after stroke 1,3,[13][14][15][16][17][18] showed decreased resting SICI in the ipsilesional M1, an abnormality that may normalize in the chronic stage. 15,[17][18][19] Movement-related changes in SICI in stroke patients intending to move the paretic hand have not been investigated. Here, we hypothesized that dynamic modulation of premovement SICI, as described in healthy subjects, [7][8][9] would be impaired in the ipsilesional M1 of chronic stroke patients moving the paretic hand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%