See reply: EK Fansa et al C iliary dysfunction underlies multiple human genetic diseases, and mechanisms of protein trafficking to cilia are an area of active investigation. PDE6D (also known as PDEd and PrBP) is a prenylbinding protein involved in ciliary targeting of prenylated proteins [1][2][3][4]. Previous studies uncovered that PDE6D interacts with RPGR [5,6], mutations of which cause retinitis pigmentosa [7][8][9][10]. More recently, the structure of the PDE6D and RPGR (the N-terminal half) complex was determined and RPGR was proposed as a scaffold protein that recruits cargo-loaded PDE6D to the ciliary base [6]. Here, we show an alternative mode of interaction between RPGR and PDE6D.Two main isoforms of RPGR and RPGR
ORF15) are expressed in vertebrates [8,11]. Of these, RPGR ORF15 appears to be expressed specifically in photoreceptor cells, while RPGR ex1-19 is expressed ubiquitously.The RPGR ex1-19 isoform (hereafter RPGR) has the CaaX prenylation motif and is geranylgeranylated at its C-terminus. The interaction between RPGR and PDE6D was initially discovered by a yeast two-hybrid screen and further verified by an in vitro GST pull-down assay [5,6]. In these studies, PDE6D was found to interact with the RCC1-like domain (RLD) within the N-terminal half of RPGR. While we were conducting our research based on these studies, we found that the interaction between RPGR and PDE6D in mammalian cells is very different from what was observed in the initial studies, which were conducted in yeast and in vitro using purified proteins. Therefore, we set out to investigate the RPGR-PDE6D interaction in more detail in mammalian cells using co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays.Various RPGR mutant variants with N-terminal FLAG tags were transfected with Myc-tagged PDE6D into HEK293T cells, and lysates were subjected to IP with anti-FLAG antibodies. As shown in Fig 1A (lane 2), the full-length RPGR bound to PDE6D. However, contrary to the previous studies [5,6], we were not able to detect any interaction between the N-terminal region of RPGR and PDE6D (lanes 3 and 4). Deletion of the CaaX prenylation motif (aa 812-815) was sufficient to disrupt the PDE6D-RPGR interaction (lane 5), indicating that prenylation is essential for PDE6D binding in mammalian cells. Furthermore, a strong interaction was detected with the C-terminal half of RPGR (lane 6). We further narrowed down the PDE6D interaction domain using GFP-tagged RPGR-mutant variants (Fig 1B). In this experiment, we found that the C-terminal 9 residues (aa 807-815), which contain the CaaX motif, were sufficient to bind to PDE6D (lane 4). Substitution of the Cys residue (aa 812) within the CaaX motif to Ser completely abolished the RPGR-PDE6D interaction (lane 9). These data demonstrate that in mammalian cells, PDE6D binds to the C-terminus of RPGR through its prenylation site.While we were mapping the PDE6D interaction domain, we noticed that amino acids adjacent to the prenylation site in RPGR contribute to PDE6D binding. For example, deletion of 11 amino acids (D...