“…In presenting a minimal formal background for research into the Aristotelian sollogistics, it is dicult to avoid taking position in a, by now classical, dispute on the 'correct' way of formalising Aristotelian logic. George Boger ([1], [2] ) named the three main lines of interpretative trends regarding the Prior Analyics traditionalists, axiomaticists, and deductionists. ukasiewicz is the most prominent axiomatist, Corcoran and Smiley are, in Boger's terminology, deductionists.…”
Section: Aristotelian Term Logic: Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'man', animal', 'living being', ...). For the sake of simplicity, we also use the symbols x, y, z, ...for elements of T. (2) There are four logical constants, A, E, Iand O, sometimes called Aristotelian quantors.…”
Section: Aristotelian Term Logic: Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In standard mathematical terminology, a reduction relation is simply a strict antisymmetric relation, and this notion has absolutely nothing in common with the classical term 'reduction', being often used for the Aristotelian process of the deduction of derived rules. See Boger ([1], [2] ) for a thorough investigation of the terms used by Aristotle. Our terminology 'derivation of syllogisms' has the advantage that it goes well together with the concept of derived rules.…”
Section: Aristotelian Term Logic: Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the aforementioned authors, however, we aim to position Aristotelian logic within the sphere of computational-combinatorical research methods. This is to provide a solid formal fundament for further computeraided research into this ancient system of formal logic 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.w3.org for detailled information. 2 It goes without saying that we will have to bridge abysses in trying to provide our methods and results in a form which make them accessible for those interested in the interpretation of classical Aristotelian logic as well as for those concerned with the properties of the formal system. 3 We plan to treat semantic matters in a subsequent paper.…”
This paper translates Aristotelian logic into the sphere of computational-combinatorical research methods. The task is accomplished by formalising Aristotle's logical system in terms of rule-based reduction relations on a suitable basic set, which allow us to apply standard concepts of the theory of such structures (Newman lemma) to the ancient logical system. In this way we are able to reproduce Aristotle's method of deriving syllogisms within a precisely dened formal environment, and we can analyse the structure of the set of syllogistic rules by means of a computer program. Thus we show that Aristotle's syllogistic logic is a formal system of its own, which can be modelled independently of predicate logic and set theory. Our research is very much in the spirit of Smiley's and Corcoran's modelling of Aristotelian logic as a deductional system, and we aim to staying close to Aristotle's own termlogical concepts.
“…In presenting a minimal formal background for research into the Aristotelian sollogistics, it is dicult to avoid taking position in a, by now classical, dispute on the 'correct' way of formalising Aristotelian logic. George Boger ([1], [2] ) named the three main lines of interpretative trends regarding the Prior Analyics traditionalists, axiomaticists, and deductionists. ukasiewicz is the most prominent axiomatist, Corcoran and Smiley are, in Boger's terminology, deductionists.…”
Section: Aristotelian Term Logic: Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'man', animal', 'living being', ...). For the sake of simplicity, we also use the symbols x, y, z, ...for elements of T. (2) There are four logical constants, A, E, Iand O, sometimes called Aristotelian quantors.…”
Section: Aristotelian Term Logic: Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In standard mathematical terminology, a reduction relation is simply a strict antisymmetric relation, and this notion has absolutely nothing in common with the classical term 'reduction', being often used for the Aristotelian process of the deduction of derived rules. See Boger ([1], [2] ) for a thorough investigation of the terms used by Aristotle. Our terminology 'derivation of syllogisms' has the advantage that it goes well together with the concept of derived rules.…”
Section: Aristotelian Term Logic: Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the aforementioned authors, however, we aim to position Aristotelian logic within the sphere of computational-combinatorical research methods. This is to provide a solid formal fundament for further computeraided research into this ancient system of formal logic 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.w3.org for detailled information. 2 It goes without saying that we will have to bridge abysses in trying to provide our methods and results in a form which make them accessible for those interested in the interpretation of classical Aristotelian logic as well as for those concerned with the properties of the formal system. 3 We plan to treat semantic matters in a subsequent paper.…”
This paper translates Aristotelian logic into the sphere of computational-combinatorical research methods. The task is accomplished by formalising Aristotle's logical system in terms of rule-based reduction relations on a suitable basic set, which allow us to apply standard concepts of the theory of such structures (Newman lemma) to the ancient logical system. In this way we are able to reproduce Aristotle's method of deriving syllogisms within a precisely dened formal environment, and we can analyse the structure of the set of syllogistic rules by means of a computer program. Thus we show that Aristotle's syllogistic logic is a formal system of its own, which can be modelled independently of predicate logic and set theory. Our research is very much in the spirit of Smiley's and Corcoran's modelling of Aristotelian logic as a deductional system, and we aim to staying close to Aristotle's own termlogical concepts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.