Aripiprazole and its adverse effects in the form of impulsive-compulsive behaviors: A systematic review of case reports

Akbari, Mehdi; Jamshidi, Shiva; Sheikhi, Sonay; Alijani, Farhad; Kafshchi, Parsa; Taylor, David

doi:10.1007/s00213-024-06529-5

Psychopharmacology

2024

DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06529-5

|View full text |Cite

Aripiprazole and its adverse effects in the form of impulsive-compulsive behaviors: A systematic review of case reports

Mehdi Akbari,

Shiva Jamshidi,

Sonay Sheikhi

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Problem gambling in psychotic disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence

Corbeil,

Anderson,

Béchard

et al. 2024

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionProblem gambling (PBG) is more common in people with mental health disorders, including substance use, bipolar, and personality disorders, than in the general population. Although individuals with psychotic disorders might be expected to be more vulnerable to PBG, fewer studies have focused on this comorbidity. The aim of this review was to estimate the prevalence of PBG in people with psychotic disorders.MethodsMedline (Ovid), EMBASE, PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of science, and ProQuest were searched on November 1, 2023, without language restrictions. Observational and experimental studies including individuals with psychotic disorders and reporting the prevalence of PBG were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for systematic reviews of prevalence data. The pooled prevalence of PBG was calculated using a fixed effects generalized linear mixed model and presented through forest plots.ResultsOf 1271 records screened, 12 studies (n = 3443) were included. The overall prevalence of PBG was 8.7% (95% CI = 7.8%–9.7%, I2 = 69%). A lower prevalence was found in studies with a low risk of bias (5.6%; 95% CI = 4.4%–7.0%) compared with studies with a moderate risk of bias (10.4%; 95% CI = 9.2%–11.7%). Different methods used to assess PBG also contributed to the heterogeneity found.ConclusionThis meta‐analysis found substantial heterogeneity, partly due to the risk of bias of the included studies and a lack of uniformity in PBG assessment. Although more research is needed to identify those at increased risk for PBG, its relatively high prevalence warrants routine screening for gambling in clinical practice.

show abstract

Problem gambling in psychotic disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence

Corbeil,

Anderson,

Béchard

et al. 2024

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Aripiprazole and its adverse effects in the form of impulsive-compulsive behaviors: A systematic review of case reports

Cited by 1 publication

References 80 publications

Problem gambling in psychotic disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence

Problem gambling in psychotic disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About