2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arid old-field restoration: Native perennial grasses suppress weeds and erosion, but also suppress native shrubs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rates match well with rates documented in southeastern Montana (estimated at 138 yr, Cooper Fig. Slow recovery of A. tridentata may be driven in part by fast recovery of fire-resistant understory plants, which create biotic resistance (Porensky et al 2014, Shiponeni et al 2014). Complex effects of fire on the absolute percent cover of different functional groups.…”
Section: Overstorysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These rates match well with rates documented in southeastern Montana (estimated at 138 yr, Cooper Fig. Slow recovery of A. tridentata may be driven in part by fast recovery of fire-resistant understory plants, which create biotic resistance (Porensky et al 2014, Shiponeni et al 2014). Complex effects of fire on the absolute percent cover of different functional groups.…”
Section: Overstorysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The need for shrub restoration is becoming increasingly recognized in Europe (Medina‐Roldán et al ), Africa (Linstadter & Baumann ), Australia (Wong et al ), North America (Davies et al ), and Asia (Li et al ), because many shrubs are keystone species that provide critical ecosystem services (Prevéy et al ; Fonseca et al ; van Zonneveld et al ). Shrub restoration in arid and semi‐arid rangelands is hindered by water stress, invasive species, and erosion (Porensky et al ). In North America, antelope bitterbrush ( Purshia tridentata Pursh DC) is often a priority for restoration because it serves as a keystone species that is important to wildlife.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CS among SF, SW, and NW was moderately similar, the dominated plant species were different, suggesting that restoration should combine CS and I iv to determine target plant composition. The survey suggests that land will have lower soil water content and greater soil temperature compared with less degraded land so that short-term irrigation might be useful if it can be implemented to infiltrate at least 60 cm into the soil, because irrigation can increase long-term grass establishment and reduce erosion [23], and diffuse salinity. Although Szitár et al [69] found that altered soil conditions are unlikely to pose a major limitation to vegetation recovery and restoration measures do not need to bother with soil remediation, the high mean pH value (>8) may have affected plant survival [52] because it leads to a reduced availability of micronutrients that are important for plant growth [46].…”
Section: (S) Polygonum Macrophyllum (P)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native plant species, which become fine-tuned to their local environments through natural selection, can rapidly recolonize a denuded landscape [20][21][22] and help maintain the diversity and stability of vegetative communities [5], suppress weeds and reduce erosion [23], and increase nutrient concentrations (P, N, K) and rain/water use efficiency, of which the latter is a main indicator for ecosystem productivity [24][25]. The use of native plant species during rehabilitation will also contribute to the aesthetic value of the habitat, as well as benefiting belowground ecosystems [26], minimizing resource depletion [27], ameliorating the consequences of fragmentation on populations of valuable plant species [28], attracting more visitors on flower [29], and increasing the abundance of small mammals as well as carnivorous prey selection species [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%