2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04939-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arguments Using Ontological and Causal Knowledge

Abstract: RésuméNous décrivons l'utilisation d'un système logique de raisonnement à partir de données causales et ontologiques dans un cadre argumentatif. Les données consistent en liens causaux ({A1, · · · , An} cause B) et ontologiques (o1 est_un o2). Le système en déduit des liens explicatifs possibles ({A1, · · · , An} explique {B1, · · · , Bm}). Ces liens explicatifs servent ensuite de base à un système argumentatif qui fournit des explications possibles. Un exemple inspiré de la tempête Xynthia, laquelle a provoqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formalisms like description and causal logics, e.g., (Besnard, Cordier, & Moinard, 2014;Dehaspe & Raedt, 1996;Krötzsch, Marx, Ozaki, & Thost, 2018;LeBlanc, Balduccini, & Vennekens, 2019), allow for measuring and detecting bias in data collections of diverse types, e.g, online data sets (Pitoura et al, 2017) and recommendation systems (Serbos, Qi, Mamoulis, Pitoura, & Tsaparas, 2017). They also enable the annotation of statements with trustworthiness (Son, Pontelli, Gelfond, & Balduccini, 2016) and temporality (Ozaki, Krötzsch, & Rudolph, 2019), as well as causation relationships between them (LeBlanc et al, 2019).…”
Section: Describing and Modeling Bias Using Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formalisms like description and causal logics, e.g., (Besnard, Cordier, & Moinard, 2014;Dehaspe & Raedt, 1996;Krötzsch, Marx, Ozaki, & Thost, 2018;LeBlanc, Balduccini, & Vennekens, 2019), allow for measuring and detecting bias in data collections of diverse types, e.g, online data sets (Pitoura et al, 2017) and recommendation systems (Serbos, Qi, Mamoulis, Pitoura, & Tsaparas, 2017). They also enable the annotation of statements with trustworthiness (Son, Pontelli, Gelfond, & Balduccini, 2016) and temporality (Ozaki, Krötzsch, & Rudolph, 2019), as well as causation relationships between them (LeBlanc et al, 2019).…”
Section: Describing and Modeling Bias Using Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%