Beyond Morphology 2004
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arguments for Word Syntax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also argue that the that-trace effect is a PF phenomenon. The same conclusion is reached by Ackema and Neeleman (2004), who base their argument on the fact that the that-trace effect disappears when an adverbial intervenes between that and a subject-trace, as originally noted by Culicover (1993: 557):…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…They also argue that the that-trace effect is a PF phenomenon. The same conclusion is reached by Ackema and Neeleman (2004), who base their argument on the fact that the that-trace effect disappears when an adverbial intervenes between that and a subject-trace, as originally noted by Culicover (1993: 557):…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Ideas similar to the second hypothesis, which concerns the nature of morphosyntactic representations, are found in the literature dealing with the word-phrase distinction (e.g. Ackema andNeeleman (2004), Di Sciullo (2005)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is highly likely that there is a second, higher-order loop as well, namely from the output of the syntax back to lexical insertion (that is, derivation layering, cf. Ackema & Neeleman 2004, Zwart, 2011, but that does not concern us here.…”
Section: (6)mentioning
confidence: 93%