Proceedings of the 2012 New Security Paradigms Workshop 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2413296.2413301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argumentation logic to assist in security administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge engineering is another interesting field in which some studies apply argumentation techniques for different tasks, such as to make automatic matching among existing ontologies or knowledge bases (Maio et al 2011;Maio and Silva 2014) or to discuss about a particular issue in medical guidelines (Grando et al 2012). For some critical tasks, argumentation techniques are applied too, such as an emergency rescue (Zhang et al 2012) or security administration (Rowe et al 2012). Finally, argumentation techniques have been applied in many different domains, what shows their suitability for complex and heterogeneous environments.…”
Section: Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knowledge engineering is another interesting field in which some studies apply argumentation techniques for different tasks, such as to make automatic matching among existing ontologies or knowledge bases (Maio et al 2011;Maio and Silva 2014) or to discuss about a particular issue in medical guidelines (Grando et al 2012). For some critical tasks, argumentation techniques are applied too, such as an emergency rescue (Zhang et al 2012) or security administration (Rowe et al 2012). Finally, argumentation techniques have been applied in many different domains, what shows their suitability for complex and heterogeneous environments.…”
Section: Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the included studies in the review, the most commonly used technique is rulebased inference (Hsairi et al 2006;Gaertner and Toni 2007;Moraitis and Spanoudakis 2007;Yuan et al 2009;Obeid and Moubaiddin 2009;Caiquan et al 2010;Tannai et al 2011;Xiong et al 2012;Harvey et al 2007;Huang and Lin 2010;Janjua and Hussain 2012;Wardeh et al 2012;Rowe et al 2012;van der Weide et al 2011). However, there are other techniques that must not be ignored because they offer other alternatives to reason under uncertainty, such as fuzzy logic Hsairi et al 2010;Chow et al 2013;Wang and Luo 2010;Tao et al 2014;Bedi and Vashisth 2014) Vicari et al 2003), to reason based on similarity, such as CBR Aulinas et al 2012;), or to measure the benefit of a specific action using utility functions (Ge et al 2010).…”
Section: Agent Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dung's Argumentation Framework (DAF) (Dung, 1995) ( Tannai et al, 2011;Caiquan et al, 2010;Yuan et al, 2011;van der Weide et al, 2011;Amgoud and Serrurier, 2007;Huang and Lin, 2010;Xiong et al, 2012;Rowe et al, 2012;Vreeswijk, 2005;Wang et al, 2014;Bedi and Vashisth, 2014) Preference-based Argumentation …”
Section: Argumentation Framework Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative (Hsairi et al, 2006;Moraitis and Spanoudakis, 2007;Yuan et al, 2009;Obeid and Moubaiddin, 2009;Ge et al, 2010;Hsairi et al, 2010;Ye et al, 2010;Maio et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012;El-Sisi and Mousa, 2012;Aulinas et al, 2012;Chow et al, 2013;Grando et al, 2012;Harvey et al, 2007;Marreiros et al, 2005;Rowe et al, 2012;Velaga et al, 2012;Letia and Groza, 2012;Amgoud and Serrurier, 2008;Monteserin and Amandi, 2011;Das, 2005;Bulling et al, 2008;Amgoud and Serrurier, 2007;Huang and Lin, 2010;Janjua and Hussain, 2012;Tao et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014;Kakas and Moraitis, 2003;Fogli et al, 2013;Fan et al, 2014;Bedi and Vashisth, 2014;Ferrando and Onaindia, 2013;Maio and Silva, 2014;Vicari et al, 2003;Tang and Parsons, 2005;Morge and Beaune, 2004) Competitive (Yuan et al, 2011;Keppens, 2011;Heras et al, 2013b,a;Brandao Neto et al, 2013;…”
Section: Behaviour Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation