2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.09.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argumentation graphs with constraint-based reasoning for collaborative expertise

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t s • Reasoning underlying the remote collaborative processes in complex decision making. • Abstract argumentation framework with the directed graphs to represent propositions • Conceptual graphs for ontological knowledge modelling and formal visual reasoning. • Competencies and information sources for the weighting of shared advices/opinions. • Constraints checking for conflicts detection according to medical-legal obligations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, on the one hand, it allows the formalization of conceptual and inferential knowledge of a target domain. On the other hand, the provided reasoning tools facilitate the visualization, the enrichment and the verification of the modelled knowledge by end users (Doumbouya, Kamsu-Foguem, Kenfack & Foguem, 2018;Kamsu-Foguem & Tiako, 2017;Doumbouya, Kamsu-Foguem, Kenfack & Foguem, 2015;Kamsu-Foguem & Abanda, 2015;Kamsu-Foguem, Tchuenté-Foguem, & Foguem, 2014;Kamsu-Foguem, Diallo, & Foguem, 2013;Potes Ruiz, Kamsu-Foguem & Noyes, 2013;Kamsu Foguem, Coudert, Béler & Geneste, 2008;Kamsu-Foguem & Chapurlat, 2006;Chein, Mugnier, & Croitoru, 2013). In the context of the semantic web, the conceptual graphs can play a pivotal role for some knowledge representation languages, while ensuring the interoperability and the complementarity of modes of reasoning.…”
Section: Semantic Modelling With Conceptual Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, on the one hand, it allows the formalization of conceptual and inferential knowledge of a target domain. On the other hand, the provided reasoning tools facilitate the visualization, the enrichment and the verification of the modelled knowledge by end users (Doumbouya, Kamsu-Foguem, Kenfack & Foguem, 2018;Kamsu-Foguem & Tiako, 2017;Doumbouya, Kamsu-Foguem, Kenfack & Foguem, 2015;Kamsu-Foguem & Abanda, 2015;Kamsu-Foguem, Tchuenté-Foguem, & Foguem, 2014;Kamsu-Foguem, Diallo, & Foguem, 2013;Potes Ruiz, Kamsu-Foguem & Noyes, 2013;Kamsu Foguem, Coudert, Béler & Geneste, 2008;Kamsu-Foguem & Chapurlat, 2006;Chein, Mugnier, & Croitoru, 2013). In the context of the semantic web, the conceptual graphs can play a pivotal role for some knowledge representation languages, while ensuring the interoperability and the complementarity of modes of reasoning.…”
Section: Semantic Modelling With Conceptual Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the inconsistencies, first the arguments evolving in the argumentation system are weighted on the basis of the competencies of the health professionals and the credibility of the sources justifying their advice, and second some law concepts are modelled as constraints in order to check their compliance of the collaborative process. As limit of this work, the health professionals’ advice should be weighting automatically during collaborative medical practices [39]. Always in the medical domain, a new technique supported by graphical reasoning is proposed in Doumbouya et al [40] in order to formalise elements of argumentation in collaborative medical organisations using telemedicine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we add the concepts Inputs, Outputs, Preconditions to manage the dependence between actions (Fig. 7) (Doumbouya, Kamsu-Foguem, Kenfack, & Foguem, 2018;Saadati & Denker, 2010).…”
Section: Conceptual Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%