Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument‐outcome link

Meyers, Renée A.; Brashers, Dale E.

doi:10.1080/03637759809376454

Cited by 46 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Included in our analysis are Meyers and Brashers's (1998) argument data, Weingart, Brett, Olekalns, and Smith's (2007) negotiation data, Pavitt and Johnson's (1999) proposal sequencing data, and information-sharing data from Bonito, DeCamp, and Ruppel (2008). 3 The data sets have several features worth noting.…”

Section: Study Purpose and Data Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining Functional Communication as Egocentric or Group-Centric: Application of a Latent Group Model

Bonito¹,

Meyers

2011

Communication Monographs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Functional communication in small groups is generally treated as a medium (i.e., reflecting and explained by individual proclivities) or as constitutive (i.e., interaction has independent effects on outcomes). Rather than approach the problem as either/or, we assume that functional communication consists of both processes. To explore this assumption, we applied two models that offer contrasting views on this debate*Hewes's (1986, 1996, 2009) socio-egocentric model and Gonzalez and Griffin's (2002) latent group model*to four published group interaction datasets to examine the extent to which communication has individual-and group-level characteristics. Analyzed individually, the data exhibited a large proportion of egocentricity but very little grouplevel connections. An analysis of the combined and recoded data, however, revealed that discussion consists of both egocentric and group speech, but that the patterns differ. We then discuss the theoretical implications for observed patterns at different levels of analysis in the data.

show abstract

Section: Study Purpose and Data Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining Functional Communication as Egocentric or Group-Centric: Application of a Latent Group Model

Bonito¹,

Meyers

2011

Communication Monographs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Organizational valence refers to the overall feelings of the organization toward a subject. The scale to measure organizational valence is widely used in the literature [31]. The existing scale was modified to accommodate this context.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the organizational context, the organizational valence is found to be one of the most important predictors of the organizational adoption decision [31]. In most organizations, the adoption decision is not determined by only an individual, but a group of people.…”

Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the adoption of electronic health record system “contagious”?

Gan

2015

Health Policy and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The classic Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) states that the individuals' attitude predicts his/her behavior intention [34]. In the organizational context, the organizational valence is found to be one of the most important predictors of the organizational adoption decision [35]. In most organizations, the adoption decision is not determined by only an individual, but a group of people.…”

Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adoption of Electronic Health Record System: Multiple Theoretical Perspectives

Gan

Cao

2014

2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates the adoption of ElectronicHealth Record (EHR) systems by US health providers with multiple theoretical perspectives. In particular, it argues that the fit between EHR systems and clinical activities interacts with social contagion from peer healthcare providers, which influences the valence to EHR systems of focal provider, and organizational valence finally impacts the adoption intention of focal provider. The data analysis on the surveys on practitioners supported the research model.

show abstract

Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument‐outcome link

Cited by 46 publications

References 36 publications

Examining Functional Communication as Egocentric or Group-Centric: Application of a Latent Group Model

Examining Functional Communication as Egocentric or Group-Centric: Application of a Latent Group Model

Is the adoption of electronic health record system “contagious”?

Adoption of Electronic Health Record System: Multiple Theoretical Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About