Arguing in Mexico: How Uniquely Mexican Is It?

Hample, Dale; Leal, Fernando; Suro, Judith

doi:10.1080/17475759.2021.1910066

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When reviewing the conceptualizations within the cognition theme, we discovered variety in the way in which scholars talk about the cognitive aspect of conflict personalization. Firstly, conflict personalization is seen as a cognitive experience (Hample et al , 2019), cognitive appraisal (Curran and Allen, 2016) or cognitive reaction (Demir and Hample, 2019; Hample et al , 2021; Santibáñez et al , 2021). Secondly, some refer to expectations (Kim et al , 2020; Worley and Aloia, 2019) and the application of past experiences (Aloia and Worley, 2019; Hample and Cionea, 2010).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, we integrate the fields of argumentation and communication with the field of workplace conflict. Most empirical work on conflict personalization has been published in journals on argumentation and communication, mainly with a focus on how differences between nationalities are associated with conflict personalization (Hample et al , 2021; Hample and Anagondahalli, 2015), conflict personalization during family conflicts (Curran and Allen, 2016; Aloia and Worley, 2019) and conflict personalization in non-specified interpersonal conflicts (Wallenfelsz and Hample, 2010; Worley and Aloia, 2019). However, to our knowledge, scholars that focus on interpersonal workplace conflict have not integrated conflict personalization in their empirical studies, even though some do refer to the concept (Bradley et al , 2012; Jehn and Mannix, 2001; Mooney et al , 2007).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Conflict personalization: a systematic literature review and the development of an integrative definition

Hoogenboom,

Dijkstra,

Beersma

2023

IJCMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Scholars and practitioners alike wish to understand what makes workplace conflict beneficial or injurious to, for example, performance and satisfaction. The authors focus on parties’ personal experience of the conflict, which is complementary to studying conflict issues (i.e. task- or relationship-related conflict). Although many authors discuss the personal experience of conflict, which the authors will refer to as conflict personalization, different definitions are used, leading to conceptual vagueness. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop an integrative definition of the concept of conflict personalization. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a systematic literature review to collect definitions and conceptualizations from 41 publications. The subsequent thematic analysis revealed four building blocks that were used to develop an integrative definition of conflict personalization. Findings The authors developed the following definition: Conflict personalization is the negative affective as well as cognitive reaction to the self being threatened and/or in danger as a result of a social interaction about perceived incompatibilities. Practical implications The integrative definition of this study enables the development of a measurement instrument to assess personalization during workplace conflict, paving the way for developing effective research-based interventions. Originality/value Conceptual vagueness hampers theoretical development, empirical research and the development of effective interventions. Although the importance of conflict personalization is mentioned within the field of workplace conflict, it has not been empirically studied yet. This paper can serve as the basis for future research in which conflict issue and personal experience are separated.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conflict personalization: a systematic literature review and the development of an integrative definition

Hoogenboom,

Dijkstra,

Beersma

2023

IJCMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is worth noting that some researchers have argued against using Hofstede’s dimensions to describe culture at the level of the individual since they were developed to capture constructs at the group level (Al-Bannay et al, 2014). However, several studies have incorporated an adapted measure of Hofstede’s dimensions designed to measure these dimensions at the individual level (Hendricks, 2018; Yoo et al, 2011), some of these with Mexican and American samples (Hample et al, 2021; Sawicki & Chapa, 2018). Further, several of Hofstede’s dimensions overlap with constructs that are common to other models of culture and have been examined in prior research of self-stigma or align conceptually with key constructs of stigma.…”

Section: Interindividual Differences In Self-stigma Within and Across...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-stigma of mental illness among Latino people on the U.S.-México border.

Louden¹,

Avila²,

Villar³

et al. 2023

Stigma and Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People with serious mental illness often internalize society's negative attitudes toward mental illness via self-stigma. Although stigma is a culturally defined construct, little is known about how stigma manifests among cultural subgroups in the United States. Negative consequences of self-stigma, such as reluctance to seek mental health treatment, may be particularly deleterious for members of certain ethnic groups, such as Latino people, who are already disproportionately at risk for not receiving mental health treatment. The goal of the present study was to examine how facets of culture explain variance in self-stigma among Latino people, and whether culture explained variance in self-stigma beyond sociocultural and mental health variables identified by prior research. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with a sample of 343 Mexican and Mexican American people who self-identified as having a mental health concern living in the U.S.-México border region. The survey assessed self-stigma, culture, mental health, and sociodemographics. We found that multiple facets of culture, namely collectivism, power distance, and long-term orientation, were significant predictors of variance in self-stigma even after controlling for mental health and sociodemographic factors. Although some factors identified by prior research can be used to understand self-stigma among Latino people, facets of culture appear important to consider. Cultural factors should be incorporated into antistigma interventions targeting the Latino community.

show abstract

“…Desigualdad de género en el CMUDE 2023 J. MAMBERTI Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación Número Monográfico 2 (2024): 75-88 http://doi.org/10.15366/ria2024.m2.006 en cuanto a la argumentación interpersonal en contextos hispanoparlantes. Por ejemplo, en Argentina (Mamberti y Hample, 2022), Chile (Santibáñez y Hample, 2015) y México(Hample et al, 2021), los hombres mostraron una mayor agresividad que las mujeres.…”

unclassified

Desigualdad de género en el Campeonato Mundial Universitario de Debate en Español en 2023

Mamberti

2024

RIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este trabajo se centra en analizar situaciones de desigualdad de género en el Campeonato Mundial Universitario de Debate en Español (CMUDE). Con ese fin, se estudian los datos acerca de la participación y el desempeño de las personas debatientes y las personas juezas en la edición 2023 de dicha competición. Los resultados muestran que, en relación con las personas debatientes, en 2023 se mantuvieron situaciones de desigualdad identificadas en ediciones anteriores: en general, participaron más hombres ?aunque la brecha fue menor que antes? y obtuvieron mejores calificaciones. En el caso de las personas juezas ?a diferencia de lo ocurrido en ediciones anteriores?, en 2023 participaron más mujeres que hombres. Sin embargo, las mujeres ocuparon más que los hombres el rol de practicantes ?sin derecho a voto? y ejercieron menos el rol de principales; a su vez, fueron menos elegidas que los hombres para evaluar en las rondas eliminatorias.

show abstract

Arguing in Mexico: How Uniquely Mexican Is It?

Cited by 5 publications

References 22 publications

Conflict personalization: a systematic literature review and the development of an integrative definition

Conflict personalization: a systematic literature review and the development of an integrative definition

Self-stigma of mental illness among Latino people on the U.S.-México border.

Desigualdad de género en el Campeonato Mundial Universitario de Debate en Español en 2023

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About