1999
DOI: 10.1086/306577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ARGO Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Measurement Constraints on Open and Flat‐Λ Cold Dark Matter Cosmogonies

Abstract: We use data from the ARGO cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy experiment to constrain cosmogonies. We account for the ARGO beamwidth and calibration uncertainties, and we marginalize over the o †set removed from the data. Our derived amplitudes of the CMB anisotropy detected by the ARGO experiment are smaller than those derived previously. We consider open and spatially Ñat-" cold dark matter cosmogonies, with the clustered-mass density parameter in the range ) 0 0.1È1, the baryonic-mass density param… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And certainly a full maximum likelihood comparison (e.g., Ratra et al 1999b) is to be preferred. Second, it is important to reanalyze observational data and account for systematic and other effects that may have been ignored in the initial analyses (see Ganga et al 1997a for the general technique and Ratra et al 1998Ratra et al , 1999a for cases where a more careful accounting of such effects have led to significant revisions of the observational results).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And certainly a full maximum likelihood comparison (e.g., Ratra et al 1999b) is to be preferred. Second, it is important to reanalyze observational data and account for systematic and other effects that may have been ignored in the initial analyses (see Ganga et al 1997a for the general technique and Ratra et al 1998Ratra et al , 1999a for cases where a more careful accounting of such effects have led to significant revisions of the observational results).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first analyses based on COBE DMR used N = 2 parameters, the scalar quadrupole normalization A s and tilt n s of the power spectrum (e.g., Smoot et al 1992;Gorski et al 1994;Bond 1995;Bunn & Sugiyama 1995;Tegmark & Bunn 1995). Since then, many dozens of papers have extended this to incorporate more data and parameters, with recent work including Bunn & White (1997); de Bernardis et al (1997); Ratra et al (1999); Hancock et al (1998); Lesgourges et al (1999); Bartlett et al (1998); Webster et al (1998); Lineweaver & Barbosa (1998ab); White (1998); ; Gawiser & Silk (1998); Contaldi et al (1999), Griffiths et al 1999;Melchiorri et al (1999); Rocha (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations have begun to provide interesting constraints on cosmological parameters (see, e.g., Ratra et al 1999a;Rocha et al 1999;Knox & Page 2000;Wang & Mathews 2002;Podariu et al 2001;Netterfield et al 2002;Pryke et al 2002;Stompor et al 2001;Wang, Tegmark, & Zaldariaga 2002;Efstathiou et al 2002). To determine high precision constrains from CMB anisotropy data, it must be carefully cleaned of any contaminating foregrounds to extract purely cosmological fluctuations to high accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%