2019
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Areal parameter estimates from multiple datasets

B. L. N. Kennett

Abstract: A wide range of methods exist for interpolation between spatially distributed points drawn from a single population. Yet often multiple datasets are available with differing distribution, character and reliability. A simple scheme is introduced to allow the fusion of multiple datasets. Each dataset is assigned an a priori spatial influence zone around each point and a relative weight based on its physical character. The composite result at a specific location is a weighted combination of the spatial terms for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Moho surface displayed in Figure 6 has been constructed using the procedure developed by Kennett (2019) in which the estimate of the local Moho at a spatial point is constructed from a sum of contributions from all available data points with allowance for weighting and the distance of these data points from the sample point. For different data sets we assign internal weights based on the quality of the result, e.g., for reflection picks we have used A = 0.9, B = 0.8, C = 0.7, D = 0.6.…”
Section: S3 Moho Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Moho surface displayed in Figure 6 has been constructed using the procedure developed by Kennett (2019) in which the estimate of the local Moho at a spatial point is constructed from a sum of contributions from all available data points with allowance for weighting and the distance of these data points from the sample point. For different data sets we assign internal weights based on the quality of the result, e.g., for reflection picks we have used A = 0.9, B = 0.8, C = 0.7, D = 0.6.…”
Section: S3 Moho Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have followed Kennett (2019) to use an empirical relation, calibrated against receiver function results, to give an uncertainty 𝑒 in kilometres from a data weight 𝑤: 𝑒 = 0.8 + 6.0 * (1 − 𝑤). In Figure S4 we show the consistency and uncertainty estimates associated with Moho surface displayed in Figure 7.…”
Section: S3 Moho Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%