2017
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area‐wide mass trapping by pheromone‐based attractants for the control of sugar beet weevil (Bothynoderes punctiventris Germar, Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Abstract: This is the first study to implement an AW program for SBW. It may not be possible to state from this study that trapping alone can reduce the SBW population below the economic threshold level. However, the data do suggest that trapping can play an important role in the reduction of insecticide applications and in creating an integrated pest management plan for dealing with SBW under similar circumstances. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, semiochemicals, such as sex and/or aggregation pheromones, are highly desirable for trapping and possibly use in direct control strategies ( e . g ., mass trapping 19 , attraction-and-kill 20 , and mating disruption 21 . Here, we describe the isolation, identification, and field evaluation of an aggregation pheromone produced by H .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, semiochemicals, such as sex and/or aggregation pheromones, are highly desirable for trapping and possibly use in direct control strategies ( e . g ., mass trapping 19 , attraction-and-kill 20 , and mating disruption 21 . Here, we describe the isolation, identification, and field evaluation of an aggregation pheromone produced by H .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoallexins (Jeandet et al, 2014;Singh and Chandrawa, 2017) Insecticidal Plants (Sarwar, 2015b;Villaverde et al, 2016;Hikal et al, 2017) Semiochemicals (El-Shafie and Faleiro, 2017; Murali-Baskaran et al, 2017; Saha and Chandran, 2017), Pheromones (Kirk, 2017) Antifeedants (Koul 2008) Attractants (Drmic et al, 2017), Repellents (Abtew et al, 2015) Push-pull technology for insect control (Khan et al, 2011;Pickett et al, 2014;Bhattacharyya 2017) Herbicidal plants (Ghosh et al, 2015;Villaverde et al, 2016;Mondale et al, 2018) Allelochemicals (Saxena et al, 2016;Muzell Trezzi et al, 2016;Xuan et al, 2016;Ashraf et al, 2017) Push-pull technology for weed control (Khan et al, 2011;Pickett et al, 2014) Biopesticides Disease control (Villaverde et al, 2016;Damalas and Koutroubas, 2018) Insect control (Kumar 2015;Tijjani et al, 2016;Nawaz et al, 2016;Villaverde et al, 2016;Damalas and Koutroubas, 2018) Weed control (Villaverde et al, 2016) IPM-involving biocontrol agents or biopesticides…”
Section: Biofertilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is often necessary to repeat the treatments (Bažok et al, 2013), which is not in accordance with Integrated Pest Management (IPM) principles, nor with rational use of plant protection products to which the modern agriculture aims. Accordingly, it is necessary to change the approach of the weevil control from an individual field approach toward controlling the larger affected area (Drmić et al, 2017). It is necessary to develop a strategy aimed to suppress the weevil population on the whole endangered area and to combine all available tools and methods avoiding the use of classical chemical control measures.…”
Section: Strict Registration and Authorization Procedures Formentioning
confidence: 99%