1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980713)396:4<493::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area-specific laminar distribution of cortical feedback neurons projecting to cat area 17: Quantitative analysis in the adult and during ontogeny

Abstract: Corticocortical pathways can be classified as feedback and feedforward, in part according to the laminar distribution of the parent cell bodies. Here, we have developed exhaustive sampling procedures to determine unambiguously this laminar distribution. This shows that individual extrastriate areas in the adult cat have highly stereotyped proportions of supragranular layer neurons with respect to the total population of neurons back-projecting to area 17. During development, these adult laminar patterns emerge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance rule governing the hierarchical relationships of cortical areas may well be an organizing principle of monkey neocortex. Evidence supporting this view comes from the laminar organization of afferents in the frontal lobe (Barbas 1986) and the somatosensory cortex (Batardiere et al 1998). These results have potentially important consequences for how we view the influence and role of the inter-areal connections to the local cortical circuits.…”
Section: Inter-arealsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The distance rule governing the hierarchical relationships of cortical areas may well be an organizing principle of monkey neocortex. Evidence supporting this view comes from the laminar organization of afferents in the frontal lobe (Barbas 1986) and the somatosensory cortex (Batardiere et al 1998). These results have potentially important consequences for how we view the influence and role of the inter-areal connections to the local cortical circuits.…”
Section: Inter-arealsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, the non-visual projections to the peripheral V1 can be as large as the projection arising from the motion visual area MT/V5 (Falchier et al, 2002), which is known to exert an influential impact on V1 responses (Hupé et al, 1998). In addition, all of these heteromodal connections do not consist in scattered projecting neurons, but rather have a topological organization (Batardiere et al, 1998) with a relatively compact projection zones probably linked to cortical functional modules. For example, in the cat, the auditory projection from area PAF is organized with respect to the retinotopic organization of the primary visual cortex (Hall and Lomber, 2008).…”
Section: Primary Sensory Areas Receive Non-specific Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study shows that the reciprocal projections from visual areas to auditory cortex arise from mainly infragranular cells. Although anterograde tracer experiments are still lacking to confirm the features of this projection, this pattern of retrograde labeling is consistent with a feedback laminar organization (Rockland and Pandya 1979;Maunsell and Van Essen 1983;Kennedy and Bullier 1985;Weller and Kaas 1985;Barbas 1986;Boussaoud et al 1990;Felleman and Van Essen 1991;Distler et al 1993;Batardiere et al 1998;Grant and Hilgetag 2005). Projections from early visual and other sensory modalities to auditory cortex were found to be organized similarly in the gerbil (Budinger et al 2008).…”
Section: Laminar Distribution Of Projecting Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%