2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424037112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area burned in the western United States is unaffected by recent mountain pine beetle outbreaks

Abstract: In the western United States, mountain pine beetles (MPBs) have killed pine trees across 71,000 km 2 of forest since the mid-1990s, leading to widespread concern that abundant dead fuels may increase area burned and exacerbate fire behavior. Although standlevel fire behavior models suggest that bark beetle-induced tree mortality increases flammability of stands by changing canopy and forest floor fuels, the actual effect of an MPB outbreak on subsequent wildfire activity remains widely debated. To address this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
104
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Simard et al [86] reported that the MPB outbreak in Greater Yellowstone may reduce the probability of active crown fires in the short term (up to 35 years after a beetle outbreak) by thinning lodgepole pine canopies. Likewise, a recent study in western USA claimed that the observed effect of MPB infestation on the area burned in 2002-2013 appears negligible at broad spatial extents [36]. Meigs et al [89] claimed that following MPB outbreak, fire likelihood is neither higher nor lower than in non-MPB-affected forests in the Pacific Northwest of USA.…”
Section: Forest Firementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Simard et al [86] reported that the MPB outbreak in Greater Yellowstone may reduce the probability of active crown fires in the short term (up to 35 years after a beetle outbreak) by thinning lodgepole pine canopies. Likewise, a recent study in western USA claimed that the observed effect of MPB infestation on the area burned in 2002-2013 appears negligible at broad spatial extents [36]. Meigs et al [89] claimed that following MPB outbreak, fire likelihood is neither higher nor lower than in non-MPB-affected forests in the Pacific Northwest of USA.…”
Section: Forest Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is expected that surface fires will be more likely to spread into the canopy during the gray stage [85] and salvage logging is a recommended method of forest management to reduce the fire hazard [80][81][82]. However, MPB and its impacts on fuel accumulation and subsequent fire hazard are poorly understood: some studies have suggested higher probability or severity of fire following beetle outbreak [66,79,80], while others suggest a decreased fire probability [2,86], or no evidence of any relationship between MPB and active fire [34][35][36][87][88][89]. Based on an extensive literature review, Jenkins et al [80] concluded that both rates of fire spread and fire-line intensities were higher in the current outbreak's stands than in endemic stands.…”
Section: Forest Firementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nor do we account for the influence of climate change on lightning activity, which may increase with warming (40). We also do not account for how fire risk may be affected by changes in biomass/fuel due to increases in atmospheric CO 2 (41), drought-induced vegetation mortality (42), or insect outbreaks (43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection rates also increased with fire size. Possibly this is because heavy fuels in western fires [13] may continue to combust after the fire front has passed. …”
Section: Modis Fire Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%