PsycEXTRA Dataset 2006
DOI: 10.1037/e516602012-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings from this study suggest a critical time to implement bullying intervention programs that address peer support, connectedness to school, provictim attitudes and in particular negative outcome expectancies around perpetration, is prior to the transition to and within the first year of secondary school. (Skiba et al, 2008;Ttofi & Farrington, 2009) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings from this study suggest a critical time to implement bullying intervention programs that address peer support, connectedness to school, provictim attitudes and in particular negative outcome expectancies around perpetration, is prior to the transition to and within the first year of secondary school. (Skiba et al, 2008;Ttofi & Farrington, 2009) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A zero tolerance approach to bullying mandates the application of predetermined consequences which are most often punitive in nature and intended to be applied regardless of the gravity of behavior, mitigating circumstances or situational context (Skiba et al, 2008). Skiba and colleagues (2008) conclude a zero tolerance approach has not been shown to improve school climate, school safety or student behaviour and may not be appropriate for early adolescents where bullying incidents may arise due to poor judgment resulting from developmental immaturity.…”
Section: Outcome Expectanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1990s saw a rapid increase in the application of zero tolerance discipline policies (Heaviside, Rowand, Williams, & Farris, 1998;Skiba & Knesting, 2001;Skiba et al, 2006). These policies were driven in part by legislation at the federal and state level that ostensibly removed some autonomy from local actors by dictating mandatory responses to certain disciplinary infractions (Curran, 2016a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ansätze der primären oder generellen Prävention zielen darauf ab, in der gesamten Population (Aronson, 2004;Bell, 2002;Dwyer et al, 1998;Dwyer & Osher, 1999;Fein et al, 2002;Schneider Denenberg, Denenberg & Braverman, 1998;Skiba et al, 2006;Stancato, 2001;Wike & Fraser, 2009 Linssen & Marks, 2009;Robertz, 2007b), bezweifeln andere deren Wirksamkeit aufgrund der geringen Spezifität der Maßnahmen (Bondü & Scheithauer, 2009a;Bondü & Scheithauer, in press;Kobe, 2009 Anerkennung evozieren könnte (Dase, 2010). Die Verwendung der Täternamen oder nicht retuschierter Fotos (Dase, 2010) sollte ebenso unterbleiben wie die vereinfachte Darstellung von Tatmotivationen oder Täterfantasien (Robertz, 2007c;Robertz & Wickenhäuser, 2007).…”
Section: Ansätze Der Primären Präventionunclassified