2015
DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2015.1028428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are your ducks in a row? External and internal stakeholder perceptions of the benefits of parks in New South Wales, Australia

Abstract: This research examines the strategic alignment between external and internal stakeholders' perceptions of the benefits of parks. To achieve this objective, surveys were distributed to park agency staff, as well as a sample of residents in New South Wales, Australia. Findings revealed alignment between external and internal stakeholders, with executive managers' perceptions being generally more favourable than staff and community. The paper pays particular attention to the alignment of internal stakeholders' (s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research contributes to the tourism field by exploring how theory from cognitive psychology can be utilized to provide a more nuanced understanding of the tourism experience and vice-versa (Tung and Ritchie, 2011a;Kim and Brown, 2012;Kim J. H et al, 2012;Pearce and Packer, 2013;Torland et al, 2015;Scott et al, 2017;Moyle et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020). Specifically, this research adds value to the studies on mental processes associated with tourism experiences (Ma et al, 2013(Ma et al, , 2017Campos et al, 2016Campos et al, , 2018Skavronskaya et al, 2019a) and contributes to a better understanding of the role of novelty both an antecedent to, and consequence of, MTEs (Chandralal and Valenzuela, 2015;Mitas and Bastiaansen, 2018;Skavronskaya et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This research contributes to the tourism field by exploring how theory from cognitive psychology can be utilized to provide a more nuanced understanding of the tourism experience and vice-versa (Tung and Ritchie, 2011a;Kim and Brown, 2012;Kim J. H et al, 2012;Pearce and Packer, 2013;Torland et al, 2015;Scott et al, 2017;Moyle et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020). Specifically, this research adds value to the studies on mental processes associated with tourism experiences (Ma et al, 2013(Ma et al, , 2017Campos et al, 2016Campos et al, , 2018Skavronskaya et al, 2019a) and contributes to a better understanding of the role of novelty both an antecedent to, and consequence of, MTEs (Chandralal and Valenzuela, 2015;Mitas and Bastiaansen, 2018;Skavronskaya et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This review, therefore, encompasses the full spectrum of what is commonly referred to as the "park benefits literature" (e.g. Moyle, Weiler, & Moore, 2014;Torland, Weiler, Moyle, & Wolf, 2015). Intentional transformative experiences in parks could include nature walks that attract those specifically seeking relaxation or improved physical health; however, these transformations may also be incidental in those who participated for other reasons such as socialising or sightseeing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How such measures are perceived and accepted by the public, and how to make them more readily acceptable (e.g., through persuasive communication (e.g., [91]) was less of a focus in our target journals. Another strand of research that deserves attention is the capacity, capability, and willingness of national park and other green space management agencies on adopting and reinforcing tourism and recreation management measures, especially in light of conflicting political pressures and complex stakeholder influences [92][93][94].…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%