1994
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(94)90040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are you using neuronal densities, synaptic densities or neurochemical densities as your definitive data? there is a better way to go

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
1
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
106
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…mation of the percentage of spared tissue was calculated using the Cavalieri method. The total volume of spared white and lesion area was calculated by summing their individual subvolumes (Oorschot, 1994). Individual subvolumes of lesion area and spared tissue were calculated by multiplying the cross-sectional area ( A) by D, where D represents the distance between sections (200 m).…”
Section: Figure 1 Demyelination After Contusive Sci a Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mation of the percentage of spared tissue was calculated using the Cavalieri method. The total volume of spared white and lesion area was calculated by summing their individual subvolumes (Oorschot, 1994). Individual subvolumes of lesion area and spared tissue were calculated by multiplying the cross-sectional area ( A) by D, where D represents the distance between sections (200 m).…”
Section: Figure 1 Demyelination After Contusive Sci a Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related reductions in synaptic numerical densities, however, cannot be unambiguously interpreted as evidence of synapse loss, in that they can result from changes in either the volume of the region, or synapse number or both. Estimating total synapse GEIN1SMAN, GUNDERSON, VAN DER ZEE and WEST number, rather than synaptic numerical density, eliminates the questionable assumption, implicit in comparisons of density data, that the volumes of the regions being compared are the same (Braendgaard & Gundersen, 1986;Swaab & Uylings, 1987;Oorschot, 1994).…”
Section: Estimating Total Synapse Number Rather Than Synaptic Numerimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unbiased estimation of the percentage of spared tissue was calculated using the Cavalieri method 26 . The total volume of spared white and gray matter was calculated by summing their individual subvolumes 27 . Individual subvolumes of spared tissue were calculated by multiplying the cross-sectional area A x d, where d represents the distance between sections (240 µm).…”
Section: Tissue Processing Histology and Lesion Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%