2005
DOI: 10.1080/01439680500064918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are you tough enough? The image of the special forces in british popular culture, 1939–2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within sociological analyses of the military, memoirs have been used as sources of empirical information for understanding the forms, functions and spatialities of military masculinities (Duncanson, 2009, 2011; Higate, 2003; Woodward, 1998; Woodward & Jenkings, in press-a), the practices of military communication and cohesion strategies (Baker, 2010a, 2010b; King, 2006; Kinzer Stewart, 1991), the organisation of military capabilities (King, 2009, 2010), the articulation of citizenship ideas amongst military personnel (Woodward, 2008) and the understanding of mental and physical trauma and narratives of trauma in war (see Robinson, 2011, 2012; Woodward & Jenkings, in press-b). As cultural documents, they invite analysis for the ideas they promote about distinct groups such as Elite and Special Forces (Connelly & Willcox, 2005; Newsinger, 1997), and inform popular ideas about military life so influential in recruitment (Gee, 2007). …”
Section: Military Memoirs and Popular Geopoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within sociological analyses of the military, memoirs have been used as sources of empirical information for understanding the forms, functions and spatialities of military masculinities (Duncanson, 2009, 2011; Higate, 2003; Woodward, 1998; Woodward & Jenkings, in press-a), the practices of military communication and cohesion strategies (Baker, 2010a, 2010b; King, 2006; Kinzer Stewart, 1991), the organisation of military capabilities (King, 2009, 2010), the articulation of citizenship ideas amongst military personnel (Woodward, 2008) and the understanding of mental and physical trauma and narratives of trauma in war (see Robinson, 2011, 2012; Woodward & Jenkings, in press-b). As cultural documents, they invite analysis for the ideas they promote about distinct groups such as Elite and Special Forces (Connelly & Willcox, 2005; Newsinger, 1997), and inform popular ideas about military life so influential in recruitment (Gee, 2007). …”
Section: Military Memoirs and Popular Geopoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Military memoirs, on the other hand, have been used extensively to analyse the connections between war, militarism and military labour in other disciplines (e.g., Connelly & Willcox, ; Duncanson, ; Duncanson, ; Gee, ; Higate, ; King, ; King, ; Kinzer Stewart, ; Newsinger, ; Robinson, ; Woodward, ). For Duncanson (), they provide important secondary data for understanding the lived experience of war and military labour, because they are first‐hand accounts by authors who have not just observed war but also experienced it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three features of the cover stand out in this threshold to the text. One is the insignia of winged dagger and 'Who Dares Wins' motto of the Special Air Service, an elite Army unit that as John Newsinger (1997) observes has currency in popular cultural imaginaries of the British Army out of all proportion to its size as a unit (see also Connelly and Willcox 2005). The second is the citation of the military honours 'DCM' and 'MM'.…”
Section: Judging a Book By Its Covermentioning
confidence: 96%