1977
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature.

Abstract: The experimental literature on adult female and male aggression is reviewed. Commonly held hypotheses that men are almost always more physically aggressive than women and that women display more indirect or displaced aggression were not supported. Evidence of the type of sex differences that sex role stereotypes would predict seemed to appear only in self-report measures of general hostility or aggressiveness. Factors that are related to observed sex differences include sex of the instigator and/or victim of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
207
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
24
207
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The reference sections of several relevant meta-analyses (Carlson, 1988;Carlson et al, 1989;Carlson & Miller, 1988;Eagly & Steffen, 1986) and qualitative reviews (Frodi et al, 1977;White, 1983) were examined for further citations. Finally, a PsycLIT search of psychological abstracts and an ERIC search was conducted for the years of 1974 to 1994 and 1966 to 1994, respectively, using the key words aggression, hostile behavior, gender, mood, and human sex differences.…”
Section: Sample Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 The reference sections of several relevant meta-analyses (Carlson, 1988;Carlson et al, 1989;Carlson & Miller, 1988;Eagly & Steffen, 1986) and qualitative reviews (Frodi et al, 1977;White, 1983) were examined for further citations. Finally, a PsycLIT search of psychological abstracts and an ERIC search was conducted for the years of 1974 to 1994 and 1966 to 1994, respectively, using the key words aggression, hostile behavior, gender, mood, and human sex differences.…”
Section: Sample Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type of provocation and other contextual variables also affect the magnitude of gender differences in aggression. The results support a social role analysis of gender differences in aggression and counter A. H. Eagly and V. Steffen's (1986) meta-analytic inability to confirm an attenuating effect of provocation on gender differences in aggression.Many experimental studies of adult aggression show that men are more aggressive than women (for reviews, see Eagly & Steffen, 1986;Frodi, Macaulay, & Thome, 1977;Hyde, 1984;and White, 1983). Earlier literature reviews (e.g., Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974;Terman& Tyler, 1954) tend to emphasize biological contributions to this difference more strongly than do later ones (e.g., Eagly & Steffen, 1986;Frodi et al, 1977;Hyde, 1984), and in more recent reviews, some scholars seriously question whether biology plays an important role in human aggression (e.g., Adams, 1992;Benton, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the sex differences in aggression decreases significantly when aggression results in a less visible actor's suffering (Eagly and Steffen 1986), which is characteristic for relational and verbal aggression. Further, adolescent girls evaluate aggression as being more harmful than boys (Coyne et al 2006), whereas women perceive the same act of direct aggression as being more aggressive than men (Frodi et al 1977). From this point of view, the effect of aggression priming should not appear for physically aggressive cognitions, but rather for the relational and verbal subscales of the WCT.…”
Section: Overview and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Bushman and Frodi, Macaulay, and Thome(1977) Dodge, 1996;Schwartz et al, 1998). Crick & Dodge, 1996).…”
Section: 또 한mentioning
confidence: 97%