1997
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1997.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are we screening too many babies for retinopathy of prematurity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While we adopt the Royal College Recommendations of screening infants less than 1500 g, we are in agreement with studies [13][14][15] that recommend lowering the BW criterion for screening infants for ROP to 1250 g. None of our patients over 1250 g developed tROP. This would have decreased the number of babies screened by 38% in our study.…”
Section: Eyesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…While we adopt the Royal College Recommendations of screening infants less than 1500 g, we are in agreement with studies [13][14][15] that recommend lowering the BW criterion for screening infants for ROP to 1250 g. None of our patients over 1250 g developed tROP. This would have decreased the number of babies screened by 38% in our study.…”
Section: Eyesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This contrasts with acute ROP in 50.9% and stage 3/4 ROP in 4.7% reported from Leicester, Nottingham, and Derby between 1985 and 1987 10 and stage 3 ROP in 2.2% of Birmingham babies studied between 1989 and 1995. 4 It is to be expected that observer bias may influence the results of studies of this nature, but these two particular reports involved the same ophthalmologist as screener. Patient demographics may have an effect, as ROP increases in severity with reducing BW and GA.…”
Section: Incidence Of Ropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previous studies have shown a geographical variation in the incidence of threshold ROP in babies born at similar gestational ages, [2][3][4] it is important to continue to analyse screening data from different regions in order to inform the debate. It is likely that screening criteria will have to be specifically defined for particular populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Accurate delineation of the population of infants who are at risk for potentially blinding ROP is essential, providing the evidence on which to base guidelines regarding which infants need to be examined. The United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada, 4,[12][13][14][15][16] along with several other countries, have developed evidencebased screening criteria, which continue to be reviewed as the population of infants who are at risk changes over time. Information on the population of infants who develop treatable ROP is required from less developed countries, to develop screening programs that include all premature infants who are at risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%